Newsletter

“A Hero Among Ruins: The Bondi Beach Attack, Institutional Failure, and the Narrative We’re Meant to Believe” - 30 December 2025

Ivor Jones The Māori Green Ltn

— 23 min read
“A Hero Among Ruins: The Bondi Beach Attack, Institutional Failure, and the Narrative We’re Meant to Believe” - 30 December 2025

Ahmed Al Ahmed, the 43-year-old Syrian-Australian fruit shop owner who disarmed one of two gunmen at Sydney’s Bondi Beach on December 14, 2025, represents something profoundly important to Australia: a moment of ordinary human courage in the face of extraordinary darkness. He saw people dying. He felt what he described as a spiritual compulsion—”my soul asked me to do that”—and he acted.

His words, captured in interviews with CBS News and the ABC, carry the weight of genuine moral clarity:

he didn’t hesitate, he didn’t calculate, he moved. And he paid for it. Shot four to five times in the shoulder and arm, he underwent multiple surgeries and faces months of nerve rehabilitation to recover full use of his limb.

Australia, and the world, has rightly celebrated Ahmed Al Ahmed as a hero.

And that is precisely why the story of his heroism must not distract us from the systemic carnage that made his heroism necessary.

A Hero Among Ruins

Who Died. And How.

On the evening of December 14, 2025, 15 people were shot and killed—and 40 others injured—at a Hanukkah celebration called “Chanukah by the Sea” at Bondi Beach.

The victims ranged in age from 10 to 87. Many were Holocaust survivors. Several were children. One was a 10-year-old girl, Matilda, who initially survived but died from her injuries in hospital. Several others—Rabbi Eli Schlanger (41), Boris and Sofia Gurman (69 and 61, a couple of 34 years), Reuven Morrison (61)—died attempting to shield others. One family threw bricks. One couple wrestled the gunmen. Another group shielded children with their bodies.

Seventeen families have since called for a federal royal commission. They have not asked for statues to Ahmed Al Ahmed. They have asked a single question: Why were these warnings ignored?

The gunmen were identified as Sajid Akram (50) and Naveed Akram (24)—a father and son. Sajid was shot dead by police during the attack. Naveed survived, was hospitalized, and now faces 59 charges including 15 counts of murder and one count of terrorism.

What emerges from police documents, intelligence reports, and news investigations is a portrait of two men driven by Islamic State ideology, meticulously planning an attack over months, with visible connections to an extremist network that Australian intelligence services knew about, investigated, and then abandoned.

This is the hidden whakapapa—the genealogy of failure—that every Australian should understand.

Who Died And How

The Network: Wisam Haddad and the Institutional Immunity of Extremism

At the center of the radicalization network is a figure who has become a test case for Australia’s willingness to confront extremism:

Wisam Haddad, an Islamic preacher who co-founded and operates the Al Madina Dawah Centre in Bankstown, Sydney.

In July 2025—just five months before the Bondi attack—a Federal Court judge found that Haddad’s lectures breached Australia’s Racial Discrimination Act. Justice Angus Stewart determined that a series of lectures titled “The Jews of Al-Medina” (delivered in November 2023) contained statements describing Jewish people as “vile,” “treacherous,” “descended from apes and pigs,” and “hiding like rats.” The court found Haddad had invoked age-old conspiracy theories—that Jews control banks and media.

Justice Stewart’s language was unambiguous:

the material was “fundamentally racist and antisemitic, devastatingly offensive and insulting,” and was “likely to have a profound and serious effect on Jewish Australians.” Haddad was ordered to remove the material, pay substantial legal costs, and refrain from similar conduct.

Yet Haddad has never been charged with terrorism, despite admissions by counterterrorism officials that he has served as a “spiritual leader” of Australia’s pro-Islamic State network. An ASIO undercover agent, codenamed Marcus, infiltrated his prayer centre and reported witnessing the indoctrination of teenagers into violent extremism. After Four Corners revealed this evidence in June 2025, Haddad’s charity, “Dawah Van Incorporated,” which had been registered since 2022 and had been receiving government tax concessions while preaching extremism on Sydney’s streets, finally had its charity status revoked by the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission.

It was June 2025 when the ACNC acted. By that time, Naveed Akram had already been trained and was already planning an attack.

Through his lawyer, Haddad denies involvement in the Bondi shooting. This is likely true in the technical sense. But the ecosystem he built—the authority he wielded, the young men he influenced, the ideological permission structure he constructed—is the incubator in which Naveed Akram was radicalized.

The Network

The trajectory of Naveed Akram through this ecosystem is where the institutional failure becomes crystalline.

In 2019, at age 17, Naveed Akram appeared in videos as a street preacher alongside Youssef Uweinat, an IS youth recruiter. In the videos, he told schoolboys that “the law of Allah is more important than anything else you have to do—work, school.” He spoke of how God rewards actions taken “in his cause.” He was worshipping at Al Madina Dawah Centre and was associated with members of a Sydney-based IS cell, including Isaac El Matari, who was later jailed for declaring himself the Australian commander of IS.

In October 2019, the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) launched an investigation into Naveed Akram. The investigation lasted six months. At its conclusion, ASIO determined there was “no evidence” of radicalization.

This finding stands as the pivotal moment of institutional failure.

Naveed Akram, then 18 years old, was visibly, documented, embedded in an Islamic State network, preaching IS ideology in public, associated with convicted IS recruiters, worshipping under a cleric who has since been found by a Federal Court to incite hatred against Jews. And ASIO concluded there was nothing to be concerned about.

What happened next is the crucial part: nothing happened for six years.

According to counterterrorism expert Greg Barton, there was no follow-up investigation, no periodic reassessment, no attempt to monitor whether Naveed remained radicalized or had moved away from extremism. “Unless additional information surfaces,” Barton told the ABC, “it seems there were no attempts made to follow up over the past six years to assess any changes in his status. If that is the case, it represents a significant oversight.”

An oversight. The understatement is staggering.

By late October 2025—just seven weeks before the attack—police documents show Naveed and his father conducting shooting practice in rural New South Wales, with videos found on Naveed’s phone showing them posing in front of an Islamic State flag. In November 2025, the pair travelled to the Philippines—specifically Mindanao, a known hotspot for the Islamic State of East Asia (ISEA), a designated terrorist organization. Investigators believe they received military-style training there. On December 12, just two days before the attack, CCTV footage captured them conducting reconnaissance at Archer Park, walking the same footbridge where they would open fire 48 hours later.

No alarms. No alerts. No intervention.

A Surveillance Gap Costing Lives

The Gun License That Should Never Have Existed

Compounding this intelligence failure was an institutional failure on a separate but equally critical track.

Sajid Akram, Naveed’s father, held a basic Category A/B firearms license—the entry-level license that allows unlimited ownership of low-powered rifles and shotguns. He had held this license for a decade, ostensibly for “recreational hunting.”

In 2023—at a time when ASIO had just completed its investigation into his son’s IS connections—Sajid’s license was renewed and he was authorized to legally possess six firearms.

The NSW Police Commissioner confirmed that no intelligence sharing occurred between ASIO and the NSW Firearms Registry. The registry had no knowledge that Sajid lived with a young man who had been investigated for IS associations. No family-member cross-checks. No coordination between federal intelligence services and state licensing bodies. A man whose son was known to have attended prayer centres led by extremists, preached with IS recruiters, and had been investigated by ASIO for IS ties—was granted the legal right to accumulate military-grade weaponry.

This is not a loophole. It is a chasm.

The Gun License That Should Never Have Been

The Question Everyone Should Ask: Why Didn’t They Notice?

Over the past week, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has acknowledged “significant issues” with intelligence coordination, and ASIO Director-General Mike Burgess has stated:

“Tragically, in this case we did not know about the attack before it happened. That is a matter of grave regret for me and my officers. It weighs on us heavily.”

But Burgess also said something else: “That does not necessarily mean there was an intelligence failure or that my officers made mistakes.”

Let me translate that for you:

We don’t yet know if we failed, so let’s not jump to conclusions before the inquiry.
This is institutional self-protection in real time.

The Albanese government has announced an inquiry headed by retired bureaucrat Dennis Richardson. This inquiry will report by April 2026—four months away. It is not a royal commission. Seventeen victim families have demanded a royal commission. Albanese refused, citing a need for “urgency” and “unity” rather than “division and delay.”

What this actually means:

We will conduct an inquiry that reports after the media cycle has cooled. We will let institutions investigate themselves. And we will not be forced to make public findings that might require accountability at senior levels.

Why Didn’t They Notice

The Institutional Context: A Segal Plan Gathering Dust

This is where the question deepens. In July 2025, Prime Minister Albanese publicly accepted a comprehensive antisemitism action plan developed by Jillian Segal, the government’s Special Envoy Against Antisemitism. The plan contained sweeping recommendations for action across police, universities, media, immigration, and public institutions.

This plan was never formally implemented. It sat on the Prime Minister’s desk.

Former treasurer Josh Frydenberg, responding after Bondi, said bluntly:

“If that is not a metaphor for the failure of government to act with the urgency that we need, I don’t know what is.”

The security establishment knew antisemitism was rising. The Jewish community warned. The intelligence services identified it as the primary domestic security threat. And the government’s formal response was filed away.

Gathering Dust

The Media Narrative: Why Ahmed’s Heroism Can’t Distract From Systemic Failure

This is the crucial moment for accountability journalism. Ahmed Al Ahmed’s heroism is genuine, beautiful, and deserves the global recognition it has received. His GoFundMe campaign has raised more than AU$2.5 million. Billionaire hedge fund manager Bill Ackman donated AU$66,000 and promoted the fundraiser. Prime Minister Albanese called him “an inspiration for all Australians.”

But the overwhelming media focus on Ahmed’s individual heroism serves a narrative function:

it allows the nation to feel pride and relief without confronting institutional complicity.

The story that circulates is:

An ordinary Australian hero emerged, disarmed a terrorist, and saved lives. This is emotionally satisfying. It suggests the system works—that individual virtue and courage can overcome evil.

The story that must circulate is:

An extremist network that intelligence services knew about was left unmonitored for six years.

A weapons license was issued to a man living with a person under investigation for IS connections.

A charity radicalized young people while claiming tax deductions.

A cleric incited hatred against Jews but was never charged.

And the government’s plan to combat antisemitism sat unimplemented while the threat metastasized.

Both stories are true. Only the second story demands accountability.

Systematic Failure

WHITE SUPREMACY AND NEOLIBERALISM: THE HIDDEN ARCHITECTURE

To understand why institutions failed so catastrophically—and why the response prioritizes heroism narratives over accountability—we must examine two frameworks that structure Australian power:

white supremacy and neoliberalism. These are not abstract theories. They are visible, verifiable systems that killed 15 people at Bondi Beach.

Defining the Terms

Neoliberalism: The belief that markets solve all problems and that the government’s job is to get out of the way. Instead of public hospitals, prisons, schools, and security—privatize them. Deregulate them. Cut public funding. Let corporations compete. Trust profit incentives, not public service. At its core: the idea that freedom means the freedom for money and corporations to move unchecked, even if workers, communities, and public safety suffer as a result.

White Supremacy: Not just overt racism or Nazi symbolism. Institutional white supremacy is when state institutions are structured to treat white people (or Anglo-Saxon Western people) as the default, the normal, the rational authority—and other racial groups as threats, problems, or inferior. Immigration laws designed to exclude non-white people. Intelligence operations that disproportionately target Muslims. Police forces accountable only to white political structures. When these institutions fail—like ASIO failing to monitor an IS network—the failures are individualized (a bad agent made a mistake) rather than structural (the institution itself is organized around white safety first).

The Connection: Neoliberalism and white supremacy are not coincidental bedfellows. They are symbiotic. Neoliberalism says “minimize government oversight, deregulate, privatize”—which means reduced scrutiny of white-majority institutions. It says “competition and merit matter”—which erases systemic racism and makes inequality seem like personal failure. Neoliberalism says “celebrate individual heroes”—which is perfect cover for institutional failure. White supremacy, meanwhile, provides the moral foundation: Australian institutions are treated as neutral, competent, legitimate, designed by and for rational Western people.

So when they fail, we blame individuals (Ahmed heroically acting) rather than asking:

why are Australian institutions structured to fail on threats involving Muslims, while succeeding at protecting elite white constituencies?

The Connection

Example 1: ASIO Outsourcing and Privatized Intelligence

The first visible link between neoliberalism and white supremacy in the Bondi case is intelligence privatization.

ASIO has increasingly outsourced its intelligence functions to private contractors—a textbook neoliberal move designed to cut costs and “improve efficiency.” This outsourcing serves white supremacy by creating layers of opacity:

How Neoliberalism Enables White Supremacy Here:

  • Reduced Accountability: Private contractors are exempt from Freedom of Information requests and parliamentary oversight. Intelligence work is “privatized,” meaning the public—especially marginalized communities—cannot scrutinize it. If ASIO makes a mistake, it’s debated in parliament. If a private contractor makes a mistake, it stays hidden.
  • Profit Incentives Over Truth: When intelligence is privatized, the goal shifts from “find the truth about radicalization” to “maximize shareholder value by closing cases quickly.” Israeli company Cellebrite sells digital spyware to Australian government agencies—technology marketed as “neutral,” but used disproportionately against Muslim communities, Indigenous activists, and dissidents. The profit motive drives it toward overpolicing certain communities (Muslims) and underpolicing others (white supremacists in police/military).
  • Cost-Cutting and Closure: ASIO’s 2019 determination that Naveed Akram—embedded in an IS network—had “no evidence of radicalization” may reflect not malice but the logic of privatized efficiency: if contractors are paid per case closed, not per case solved, they close cases early. Continue investigating a known IS sympathizer for six years? That’s expensive. Close the case and move on? That’s profitable. Bias embedded in profit incentives.

Why White Supremacy Benefits:

Closing cases early works fine if the subject is a marginalized person. Islamic teenagers in Bankstown? Close it. But if the subject were a white supremacist in the Australian military or police? That case would stay open, get resources, get follow-up. The cheaper, neoliberal model of “close cases quickly” inherently under-investigates threats from marginalized communities and institutionalizes protection of white-majority institutions.

Result:

Naveed Akram was never reassessed because his case was “closed” by cost-conscious private intelligence systems. Six years of unmonitored radicalization. Fifteen people dead.

Outsourcing Intelligence

Example 2: Deregulated Firearms Licensing

Sajid Akram’s legal firearms license exemplifies how neoliberalism deregulates state power in ways that protect white supremacist violence.

Australia had strict firearms licensing after Port Arthur (1996). But over the past decade, under neoliberal pressure to “minimize red tape” and “remove government burden,” firearms licensing has been pushed toward what’s called “light-touch regulation”:

How Neoliberalism Enables White Supremacy Here:

  • Decentralized Responsibility, Centralized Risk: The neoliberal ideal of “decentralized decision-making” means NSW Firearms Registry operates independently from ASIO. It also operates independently from state police, from immigration, from welfare agencies. Each institution minimizes its own costs; information-sharing costs money. Result: federal intelligence about Naveed’s IS associations never reached state firearms licensing. A Syrian-Australian father with an IS-sympathizer son gets a gun license because no one institution has the complete picture—and sharing that picture would cost money and create friction.
  • Privatized Responsibility, Privatized Risk: Under neoliberalism, the burden of compliance shifts from the state to the individual. Sajid Akram had a license because he filled out forms correctly. The state’s responsibility to assess his household as a terrorism risk is treated as a regulatory “burden” to be minimized. Neoliberal logic: if the forms are signed, the transaction is legitimate. Don’t add cost by asking deeper questions.
  • “Genuine Reason” Deregulation: Australia’s firearms law requires “genuine reason” for gun ownership. Recreational hunting = genuine reason. But “my son is under investigation for IS associations” is never flagged as a reason to deny licensing. Why? Because that would require the registry to contact ASIO, which would require inter-agency coordination—a cost. So the deregulated system says: if the individual claimed hunting, the transaction is valid. The state’s role is minimized.

Why White Supremacy Benefits:

This deregulated system disproportionately protects white gun owners. Investigations of white supremacist firearms ownership are minimal, while Muslim gun owners face heightened scrutiny. Deregulation looks “neutral” but systematically under-regulates white populations and over-regulates brown populations.

Result:

A man living with an IS-connected son legally accumulated six firearms through deregulated, cost-minimized licensing. White supremacy’s structural violence enabled by neoliberal deregulation.

Deregulation

Example 3: Criminalizing Islam, Protecting Institutional Racism

The response to Bondi reveals the clearest marriage of neoliberalism and white supremacy:

selective deregulation.

NSW fast-tracked emergency anti-protest laws after Bondi, criminalizing phrases like “globalise the Intifada” and granting police broad “terrorism” powers. This serves white supremacy while appearing “race-neutral”:

How Neoliberalism Enables White Supremacy Here:

  • Asymmetric Enforcement Under Guise of Neutrality: Laws against “Islamic extremism” are strictly enforced. Wisam Haddad’s antisemitic lectures get to Federal Court. Naveed Akram’s IS associations trigger investigation. But white supremacist networks? ASIO assessed active white supremacist clubs as “unlikely to engage in violence” despite their explicitly stated ethno-nationalist violence goals. Why? The neoliberal cost-benefit calculation: it’s cheaper to prosecute visible cases (Muslims preaching in public) than to investigate deep institutional networks (white supremacists embedded in police, military, judiciary). Investigating your own institutions costs resources, creates friction, requires transparency. Much easier to prosecute brown people in the street.
  • Individual Solutions vs. Collective Accountability: Albanese offered gun buyback programs and national firearms registers—consumer solutions that feel actionable (neoliberal). Individuals hand in guns; individuals follow new rules; the market handles the rest. But he refused a Royal Commission—which would have required institutions to be collectively accountable. Royal commissions subpoena officials, force testimony, publish findings. That’s not neoliberal. That’s not cost-minimizing. A Royal Commission would force white elites (ASIO directors, judges, media proprietors) to answer for failures. Gun control lets individuals feel they’re “doing something.” A Royal Commission would require structural change.
  • Deflecting from Systemic White Supremacy: Media coverage positioned Ahmed Al Ahmed’s heroism as evidence that “the system works.” A Syrian-Australian saved the day through individual virtue—a powerful neoliberal narrative that erases institutional white supremacy. An individual hero. An individual solution (better guns regulation). An individual inquiry (not a royal commission). Neoliberalism loves this because it requires no institutional change, no accountability of power, no redistribution of resources. White supremacy loves this because it protects institutions from scrutiny: Australian institutions didn’t fail structurally; an individual agent (an ASIO officer) made a mistake.

Why This Protects White Supremacy:

Muslim communities now face disproportionate policing under new “terrorism” laws, while white supremacist networks—documented in police, military, and judiciary—continue to operate openly. Neoliberal deregulation + institutional white supremacy = selective enforcement.

Result:

15 people are dead. Muslim communities blamed and over-policed. White institutional failures left unaccountable.

Protecting Institutional Racism

How These Systems Reinforce Each Other

The marriage of neoliberalism and white supremacy at Bondi operates through a single logic:

minimize scrutiny of dominant institutions, maximize control of marginalized populations.

When something goes wrong in a white-majority institution (ASIO fails, courts fail, parliament fails), neoliberalism offers the solution: “Let’s privatize it, deregulate it, make it more ‘efficient.’” This sounds technical and neutral.

But it actually means:

remove public oversight, reduce parliamentary scrutiny, hide the workings of power.

When something goes wrong involving marginalized people (Muslims, immigrants, Indigenous people), the response is the opposite:

regulate them more, police them more, pass new laws targeting them specifically.

This is the core inversion:

deregulation for power, hyperregulation for powerlessness.

Wisam Haddad incites racial hatred—his charity loses funding (a slap on the wrist, because his network is too integrated into institutions to prosecute). Meanwhile, anti-Gaza protesters using the phrase “globalise the Intifada” face new criminal laws and police harassment.

The asymmetry is neoliberal efficiency plus white supremacy:

you regulate the marginalized (cheap, visible), you deregulate the powerful (hidden, protected).

Systems Reinforce Each Other

The Accountability That Must Follow

  1. Royal Commission: The Prime Minister must accede to the families’ demand. A royal commission is not “delay”—it is accountability.
  2. ASIO Investigation Review: Why did ASIO conclude “no radicalization” in 2019 when Naveed Akram was demonstrably embedded in an IS network? Who made this determination? On what intelligence basis? What cost-cutting pressures influenced the decision?
  3. Firearms-Intelligence Coordination: Why did the NSW Firearms Registry not receive notification of ASIO investigations? This is not a resource question; it is a question about whether deregulation and cost-minimization are being prioritized over public safety.
  4. Wisam Haddad Prosecution: If the Federal Court found Haddad incited racial hatred, why has he not been prosecuted under relevant terrorism statutes? What institutional protection does he enjoy?
  5. Segal Plan Implementation: The antisemitism plan must be formally endorsed and implemented in full—not as a gesture toward the Jewish community, but as a binding commitment.
  6. White Supremacy in Institutions: A genuine audit of white supremacist networks in Australian police, military, and judiciary—not a cost-minimized internal review, but an independent investigation with public findings.
  7. Media Accountability: News organizations must examine whether their overwhelming focus on Ahmed Al Ahmed’s individual heroism has functioned as a distraction from institutional accountability journalism.

Accountability

The Courage We Need

Ahmed Al Ahmed’s words deserve to be heard again:

“I feel something, a power in my body, my brain. I don’t want to see people killed in front of me, I don’t want to see blood, I don’t want to hear his gun, I don’t want to see people screaming. My soul asked me to do that.”

This is the courage of direct action. It is real. It is beautiful. And it must not be permitted to replace the more difficult courage that institutions require:

the willingness to admit failure, to name the powerful actors who made wrong decisions, to dismantle systems that prioritize institutional protection over public safety, and to accept accountability that extends beyond April 2026.
15 people died at Bondi Beach because of a six-year surveillance gap, a licensing coordination failure, the institutional immunity of a network that radicalized youth, and a government plan to address antisemitism that was never implemented.
They also died because neoliberal institutions—stripped of oversight, deregulated, privatized—failed to share information.
They died because a cost-minimizing intelligence system closed a case early.
They died because a gun-licensing system was deregulated in the name of “efficiency.”
They died because institutional white supremacy meant that Muslim communities were under-monitored while white supremacist networks in police and military were over-protected.

Ahmed Al Ahmed’s heroism was real. But it was also unnecessary.

These 15 people did not need to die. They died because institutions chosen not to act on the intelligence they possessed, and because those institutions are structured—through neoliberalism and white supremacy—to fail marginalized people while protecting the powerful.

That is the story that must be told. And it requires a different kind of courage—not the courage to run toward gunfire, but the courage to run toward accountability.

Kia kaha, whānau. The truth is worth the fight.

Ivor Jones The Māori Green Lantern Fighting Misinformation And Disinformation From The Far Right

Citations and Sources

Support this work through koha (voluntary contribution):
Koha Platform: The Māori Green Lantern

Subscribe for direct essays:
Substack: The Māori Green Lantern

Direct bank transfer:
Account: HTDM, Number: 03-1546-0415173-000

Every koha signals that whānau are ready to fund the accountability that Crown and corporate structures will not provide. Kia kaha.

  1. https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/collection_cf06d657-2c2b-4e68-8735-48f3c10166bd/fa7ea9f0-3948-41f0-9a6d-037b51b58d4a/Whakapiki-ki-te-ao-Maori-Application-2026.pdf
  2. https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/collection_cf06d657-2c2b-4e68-8735-48f3c10166bd/8e9b17f7-604e-4009-9ec6-abbe1fd2c989/Perspective-with-Heather-du-Plessis-Allan_-This-Government-s-all-talk-bugger-all-action.PDF
  3. https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/2123776/b89258cb-f5e7-44ab-a78c-d78fc45dfe95/Ahmed-Al-Ahmed-recounts-how-he-disarmed-one-of-the-gunmen-in-Bondi-Beach-terrorist-attack-_-RNZ-News.pdf
  4. https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/2123776/8e7ed48a-7c9b-475d-b19e-08ce58683df0/Whanau-Ora-Brochure.md
  5. https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/2123776/49856f22-cdae-4eea-b462-56553bb17ced/OSCAR-Procedures-Programmes.docx.pdf
  6. https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/2123776/1cbd34bd-3208-4692-815a-89cda15094ca/Analyse-the-twitter-account-of-https-twitter.com-ngatiyankeekiwi-lang-en-for-cognitive-bias-racism-and-fear-mongering.-Provide-references-for-all-citations-in-apa-format
  7. https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/2123776/cd8c86fa-5b0d-4517-b6b9-279e8a09988f/Mike-johnson.md
  8. https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/2123776/1b2a4180-3294-4cce-b82f-1ed2d9b7638d/When-Rugby-Becomes-Rora-A-Maori-Perspective-on-the-Industrial-Complex-of-Brain-Damage-27-August-2025.md
  9. https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/2123776/17539b1c-ac82-44ae-9e13-58efe88252a9/When-multimillionaires-think-their-time-is-worth-more-than-our-collective-well-being-30-June-2025.md
  10. https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/2123776/0ed89863-7ca1-403a-b7ff-304135a52b1c/Project-Gold-Album.pdf
  11. https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/2123776/db42d500-37b8-4ad7-966e-dcadc448b31e/Annual-timeline.xlsx
  12. https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/2123776/52d102f7-053d-4fd8-a19f-fc1f3502e6dd/The-Great-Polytechnic-Heist-How-Simmonds-Asset-Stripping-Serves-White-Supremacy-Not-Students-18-July-2025.md
  13. https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/2123776/607fca49-4c5b-49e1-b983-349d5f224af7/Kia-ora-my-name-is-Ivor-Jones-The-Maori-Green-Lantern-exposing-the-Crown-s-colonial-arrogance-and-neoliberal-assault-on-Te-Tiriti-o-Waitangi-16-July-2025v.md
  14. https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/2123776/bb218c2f-3230-4b7d-a42d-50f18b0f2763/91105-v2.pdf
  15. https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/2123776/a9d5ca5e-6f08-440a-b7f0-d268a3f2c4d2/The-Real-Reason-Linda-Yaccarino-Left-X-Tech-Colonialism-s-Final-Gambit-10-July-2025.md
  16. https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/2123776/10bd9338-e098-4d53-aaed-86375548cd48/MBG_Application_for_Investment_Form.docx
  17. https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/2123776/a59bf664-516d-4038-acf5-1ed9c8c81114/Rangatahi-Manawaroa-guidance-and-application-form-FINAL.docx
  18. https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/2123776/3657aa3e-a09a-4ac1-a40d-2c168e7f0e3f/The-Coloniser-s-Dream-How-Maori-Political-Infighting-Serves-White-Supremacy-27-August-2025.md
  19. https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/2123776/0ffcc7e1-2bde-41bb-9593-59b39d2f330d/The-NZCPR-s-Manufactured-Crisis-and-the-Defence-of-White-Supremacy-14-July-2025.md
  20. https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/2123776/9604ba51-ca92-4282-8021-a6dd634797d9/The-Coloniser-s-Dream-How-Maori-Political-Infighting-Serves-White-Supremacy-27-August-2025.md
  21. https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/2123776/413154f7-cd0e-4023-8b48-40bce8b91387/The-Great-Polytechnic-Heist-How-Simmonds-Asset-Stripping-Serves-White-Supremacy-Not-Students-18-July-2025.md
  22. https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/2123776/e2b87515-d71f-4485-a2d3-c6423d88e429/The-NZCPR-s-Manufactured-Crisis-and-the-Defence-of-White-Supremacy-14-July-2025.md
  23. https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/2123776/393fa701-0c99-4376-a1b5-17574d685932/The-Maori-Green-Lantern.md
  24. https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/2123776/4c97b005-0e2f-4260-82c7-b714dca8c50d/The-Fascist-Propaganda-Machine-24-August-2025.md
  25. https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/2123776/52a02112-c368-4308-abad-b235c1a7de60/How-RNZ-Legitimises-Far-Right-Propaganda-Through-Pollwashing-10-July-2025.md
  26. https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/2123776/e6cb21de-2cc7-4048-8319-e7536b180d5b/The-Real-Reason-Linda-Yaccarino-Left-X-Tech-Colonialism-s-Final-Gambit-10-July-2025.md
  27. https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/attachments/2123776/dd7a57e5-7b0d-46e0-8a37-616cb53edb4e/The-Far-Right-Attack-on-Maori-Democracy-26-July-2025.md
  28. https://academic.oup.com/edinburgh-scholarship-online/book/31173
  29. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc36f946f8b19005e87c011034548761d871feca
  30. https://hrdc.gujaratuniversity.ac.in/Publication/article?id=12306
  31. http://jbsge.vu.edu.au/index.php/jbsge/article/view/858
  32. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0067205X0000034X/type/journal_article
  33. https://isij.eu/article/ecosystem-platform-defence-and-security-sector-ukraine
  34. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781351982092/chapters/10.4324/9781315270449-28
  35. https://academic.oup.com/edinburgh-scholarship-online/book/31173/chapter/264218864
  36. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fcb81539c1ad900fd1fb89379b5b823985c8d825
  37. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09636412.2017.1243912
  38. /content/files/policyreview-2020-3-1493.pdf
  39. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09692290.2024.2375499?needAccess=true
  40. /content/files/ext/api/media/20c511d5-9a51-4f7f-aa5c-13193d44b6a4/assets/external_content.pdf
  41. /content/files/policyreview-2020-3-1499.pdf
  42. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10357718.2023.2279084?needAccess=true
  43. https://theconversation.com/spyware-merchants-the-risks-of-outsourcing-government-hacking-80891
  44. https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/isa/mar01/
  45. https://www.massey.ac.nz/about/news/opinion-the-institutionalised-sturcture-of-white-supremacy-in-australia/
  46. https://www.defence.gov.au/news-events/news/2025-11-18/defending-australians-against-espionage
  47. /content/files/sites/default/files/2018-11/the-private-military-industry.pdf
  48. /content/files/content/dam/dcj/dcj-website/documents/legal-and-justice/laws-and-legislation/review-of-criminal-law-protections-against-incitement-of-hate/17-australian-muslim-advocacy-network-et-al.pdf
  49. https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/foiling-espionage-and-foreign-interference-is-a-national-not-just-government-task/
  50. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23104379
  51. https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/bose-australian-muslim-advocacy-network.pdf
  52. https://www.zdnet.com/article/privatising-intelligence-gathering/
  53. https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/2115/2385
  54. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs/RWExtremists23/Report/Chapter_2_-_Nature_and_extent_of_right_wing_extremism_in_Australia
  55. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-31/asio-chief-warns-of-espionage-costs/105598696
  56. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34531/chapter/292942598
  57. /content/files/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Religion/Islamophobia-AntiMuslim/Civil-Society-or-Individuals/australiamuslimadvocacynetwork.pdf
  58. https://www.intelligence.gov.au/news/asio-annual-threat-assessment-2025
  59. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/52927288.pdf
  60. https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/the-rise-of-far-right-extremism-australia-2025/8skg4ekwe
  61. https://www.anao.gov.au/work/performance-audit/workforce-planning-the-australian-security-intelligence-organisation
  62. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10357718.2024.2398745
  63. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/shane-te-pou-we-should-examine-whether-privatisation-is-a-good-idea-the-evidence-tells-us-its-not/3NKNQ3LQHNHO3GDSS73GM4ZP7U/
  64. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/firearms-register-announced-as-part-of-governments-second-tranche-of-gun-law-reforms/EHC7WKLWPO4VOBAE676F22SZXA/
  65. https://www.propublica.org/article/trump-dhs-thomas-fugate-cp3-terrorism-prevention
  66. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/the-privatisation-debate-what-is-there-left-for-the-government-to-sell-the-front-page/OYWQTOKNLJGLXAX45MOYDKHCGQ/
  67. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/political-roundup-governments-first-round-of-gun-law-reform-a-success/PUGLPFZVL5TZUETDAYXIBC5CLI/
  68. https://www.propublica.org/article/doge-musk-mohammad-halimi-institute-peace-taliban
  69. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/524476/govt-said-security-agency-was-still-on-cards-despite-pm-s-decision-to-dump-it
  70. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/what-nz-needs-to-watch-as-australia-reforms-gun-laws-after-the-bondi-terror-attack/QWXEQVMICFGPLJMO3DQ27N6OC4/
  71. https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/programmes/morningreport/library?page=83&q=Visit+Cheapfifa23coins.com+30%25+OFF+code%3AFIFA2023%7C+I+like+this+place.+I+got+a+good+deal+on++coin+selling+fifa+23+in+LIBYA%21..++qcks
  72. https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/programmes/morningreport/audio/2018960807/new-zealand-spy-agencies-tight-lipped-on-us-document-leak
  73. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/covid-19-coronavirus-simon-wilson-is-this-the-death-of-neoliberalism/FJBET5DJYE5EMLRDASOEAXCX3I/
  74. https://www.propublica.org/article/cheap-tricks-the-low-cost-of-internet-harassment
  75. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/495199/overarching-national-intelligence-and-security-agency-not-far-off-government-says
  76. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/531634/proposed-firearms-law-change-will-endanger-the-public-mosque-attack-inquest-told
  77. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/blistering-white-people-oppression-twitter-thread-goes-viral/KEOCCBU3PLKZDTGCMUUQ5HOVLA/
  78. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/political-roundup-thompson-and-clark-has-been-doing-the-dirty-work-of-the-state/4IDDSADAEQLT553V6D3BXFRZCM/
  79. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/510341/semi-automatics-on-the-table-in-gun-laws-shake-up
  80. https://www.rnz.co.nz/tags/privatisation
  81. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/419133/firearms-reform-set-to-progress-in-parliament
  82. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/whanganui-chronicle/news/south-taranaki-iwi-ngati-ruanui-angry-at-spying-by-thompson-clark-during-trans-tasman-resources-mining-application/3X6WOTHK25R6SUEOW33J5RT6U4/

Read more