“Destroying Winston Peters: Te Māori Green Lantern Expose of Judicial Assault, Treaty Denial & Neoliberal Co-Governance Erasure” - 25 October 2025

Kia ora e te iwi,

Tēnā kōrua, tēnā kōrua, tēnā tatau katoa. I come to you as Ivor Jones—The Māori Green Lantern of Te Arawa descent—to demolish the false democracy Peters peddles at Oxford while his government systematically dismantles Māori rangatiratanga, loads prisons with our tāngata, and profits from apartheid-by-legislation.

On 23 October 2025, Foreign Minister Winston Peters stood at the Oxford Union and claimed New Zealand courts “undermine democracy” by interpreting the Treaty and tikanga in Māori interests. He lost the debate 140-70—but more importantly, he lied systematically.

His actual agenda: orchestrate with David Seymour and Paul Goldsmith to overturn Supreme Court decisions favouring Māori customary rights, thereby removing judicial independence and entrenching neoliberal appropriation of Māori coastal areas. Peters attacked courts for recognising tikanga as “ambiguous,” yet his own coalition agreement mandates erasing exactly this recognition through retrospective legislation that cancels cases already decided.^[1][2][3]

The contradiction: Peters claims democracy requires Parliament as “highest court,” yet simultaneously suspends normal parliamentary process by making MACA amendments retrospective—overriding court judgments already rendered. This is not democracy; it is authoritarian erasure dressed in constitutional language.^[4]

BACKGROUND: 50+ YEARS OF JUDICIAL ATTACKS, REAL MONEY FLOWS, HIDDEN NETWORKS

The Neoliberal Alliance: Peters, Seymour, Goldsmith & Hobson’s Pledge

Peters is not acting alone. He leads a coordinated network:

David Seymour (ACT): Funded by billionaires including Graeme Hart ($100,000 donor) through Atlas Network structures (Canadian libertarian think tank). Seymour trained at Frontier Centre for Public Policy, opposing public transport and workers’ rights. He chairs the Treaty Principles Bill—a direct attack on 40 years of judicial Treaty jurisprudence.^[5][6][7]

Paul Goldsmith (Justice Minister): Directly coordinates with Peters to override court decisions. In September 2025, Goldsmith warned lawyers that “unique court rulings recognising tikanga Māori could cost the country investment”—threatening economic harm to pressure judges. He then legislated to retrospectively invalidate CMT decisions from July 2024 onward.^[8][4]

Casey Costello (NZ First): Co-founded Hobson’s Pledge with former ACT leader Don Brash—a $500,000-funded anti-Māori lobby group. Costello chairs the NZ First-led campaign to strip section 58 of MACA.^[6][9]

Hobson’s Pledge itself: Named after a fabricated quote (”He iwi tahi tātou”—”We are one people”), this group rewrites history to justify assimilation. It spent $500,000 attacking Māori representation in 2023. Brash’s group directly feeds policy to Seymour and Peters.^[10][6]

Money trail:

• ACT received $1.46 million in donations 2024, heavily from billionaires.^[11]
• NZ First received $758,773 in 2024, including $84,680 from Melrose Private Capital (Taharoa Ironsands miner)—a conflict Shane Jones failed to disclose.^[12]
• National received $4.89 million, with property developers donating before fast-track approvals were granted.^[12]

International network: Peters, Seymour, and Goldsmith coordinate through Atlas Network structures linking to US libertarian foundations hostile to Indigenous rights globally.^[6]

THE ISSUE: DECONSTRUCTING PETERS’ JUDICIAL ACTIVISM MYTH

Fallacy #1: “Courts Made Tikanga ‘Ambiguous’”

Reality: The 2024 Supreme Court in Whakatōhea Kotahitanga Waka unanimously clarified that tikanga—defined as local, specific Māori customary law—must guide customary marine title interpretation. The court clarified that “exclusive use” means tikanga-based territorial control, not just physical possession. This is textual interpretation, not activism.^[13][14]

Peters claims courts “invented” tikanga in section 58. Lie. Section 58 itself mandates tikanga interpretation. The MACA Act (2011) explicitly requires “in accordance with tikanga” as the legal test. Judges applied the statute Parliament wrote.^[15][16]

Dog-whistle decoding: “Ambiguous concept” is coded anti-Indigenous rhetoric—reframing written law as judicial overreach to justify legislative erasure.

Fallacy #2: “Parliament’s Original Intent Was Restrictive”

Reality: In 2011 Parliament’s actual intent debates show legislators understood MACA would ease CMT access compared to the 2004 Foreshore and Seabed Act—which had extinguished all Māori customary title. The Act’s preamble states its purpose as recognizing Māori rights “under the Treaty of Waitangi.”^[15][17]

The 2024 Supreme Court found the restrictive interpretation “did not adequately address MACA’s reconciliatory purpose.” This reflects historical legislative intent to rectify colonial theft, not authorize it.^[18]

Peters’ sleight: He conflates 2004 (extinguishment era) intent with 2011 (recognition era) intent, deliberately obscuring statutory evolution.

Fallacy #3: “Equal Citizenship Requires Denying Māori Rights”

What Hobson’s Pledge actually means: White settler equality—stripping Indigenous status recognition. Brash’s group explicitly states all New Zealanders should be equal “irrespective of when they or their ancestors arrived,” erasing 500+ years of Indigenous habitation and the Crown’s 1840 treaty obligations.^[10]

Tikanga violations:

• Whanaungatanga: Judicial decisions recognizing iwi relationships to moana strengthen whānau bonds across generations—Peters’ legislation severs them.
• Rangatiratanga: Customary marine title affirms tino rangatiratanga (absolute authority) over ancestral areas—the MACA amendment removes it.
• Kaitiakitanga: Courts recognized Māori environmental stewardship of takutai moana—new laws hand control to the Crown and commercial interests.
• Manaakitanga: Peters’ policy embeds resource scarcity, forcing whānau into dependency rather than reciprocal care.

ANALYSIS: THE EVIDENCE TRAIL & HIDDEN CONNECTIONS

Real Data: Judicial Decisions Actually Favor Majority Interests

How many Māori won CMT claims? Despite Supreme Court’s clarification favouring tikanga recognition, only a handful of iwi have successfully claimed CMT since MACA’s 2011 passage—13 years of litigation for a few groups. This is not judicial activism; it’s judicial constraint given bureaucratic costs.^[17]

How many Pākehā/commercial entities challenged? Hundreds of resource consents, fast-track approvals, and commercial fishing licenses issued without equivalent judicial scrutiny.^[12][19]

Reality check: If courts were activist, they would have already resolved 200+ pending CMT claims and revolutionized resource management. Instead, they’ve upheld Parliament’s restrictive thresholds repeatedly—until 2024’s Supreme Court corrected an erroneous Court of Appeal interpretation.^[20]

Chart 1: Māori Suffer Systemic Inequality While Courts Are Blamed

Māori overrepresentation across key inequality measures: 52.6% of prison population despite 17.8% of population; 9.7% unemployment vs 3.9% overall; 23.9% of Māori children in material hardship vs 9% non-Māori; incarceration rate 5.5x higher.

Māori make up 52.6% of the prison population despite being only 17.8% of the population—a 5.5x overrepresentation rate of 820 per 10,000. Yet Peters attacks courts for recognizing Māori customary rights, not courts for sentencing disparities.^[21]

Unemployment: Māori face 9.7% joblessness vs 3.9% overall—a direct product of neoliberal policies Peters supports.^[22]

Child hardship: 23.9% of Māori tamariki live in material hardship vs 9% non-Māori.^[23]

Life expectancy: Māori die 6-7 years younger than non-Māori—a health system collapse caused by government policy, not judicial overreach.^[24]

Peters’ “judicial activism” narrative serves to deflect from his government’s actual violence: imprisonment, impoverishment, and premature death.

Chart 2: Child Poverty by Ethnicity—Reveals Apartheid Structure

Child material hardship rates by ethnicity reveal stark disparities: Pasifika children face highest rates (28.7%), followed by Māori (23.9%), with European and Asian children experiencing less than one-third the hardship rates - exposing structural inequality in childhood wellbeing.

28.7% of Pasifika children and 23.9% of Māori tamariki lack basic necessities (food, heating, doctor visits). European children face 9% hardship; Asian children 3.7%.^[23]

This is not market failure; it is colonial continuity. Peters’ 2025 government stripped free dental care for under-30s, cut public housing programs, and rejected childcare support—policies targeting the poorest, who are Māori and Pacific.^[22]

Courts recognizing Māori resource rights threaten the neoliberal extraction model that keeps Indigenous children hungry.

Chart 3: Prison Expansion Under Peters’ Coalition

Prison population trends reveal rising incarceration despite previous declines: total prison population rebounding toward 2018 crisis levels while Māori’s share remains elevated at 53%, perpetuating mass incarceration of Indigenous people under National-NZ First policies.

Prison population fell from 10,800 (2018) to 7,700 (2022) under Labour’s reforms. Under Peters’ National-ACT coalition (2024-2025), it rebounded to 9,900 actual and 10,680 projected—erasing reform gains in 18 months.

Māori’s share remained ~53% throughout, meaning Peters is personally overseeing the re-incarceration of hundreds of our tāngata annually.

Government policies explicitly driving this:

• Three Strikes sentencing restored (ACT/National)
• Judicial discretion capped at 40% reductions (ACT policy, 2025)^[25]
• Bail thresholds raised (2024-2025 reversals of Labour reforms)
• Fast-track approvals bypassing environmental/social impact assessment^[19]

Goldsmith’s role: As Justice Minister, he personally designed the sentencing reforms limiting judicial discretion—the exact “judicial activism” he claims to oppose. He restricts judges’ ability to recognize culpability and rehabilitation, then blames courts.^[25]

The International Context: Atlas Network & Neoliberal Sovereignty Assault

Peters, Seymour, and Goldsmith operate within a global neoliberal network attacking Indigenous rights through judicial constraint:

Atlas Network connections:

• Seymour trained through Frontier Centre for Public Policy (Atlas member)^[6]
• Hobson’s Pledge receives funding through international libertarian structures^[10]
• Think tanks like NZ Initiative (funded by billionaires) produce “judicial activism” reports legitimizing legislative override^[7]

Pattern globally:

• Australia: Coalition governments overrode Native Title court decisions
• Canada: Federal government reversed Wet’suwet’en court victories through legislation
• USA: Trump appointed judges to overturn Indigenous water rights

Peters’ role: Aotearoa’s conduit for this global authoritarian assault on Indigenous sovereignty, dressed in “democracy” language.

Money Behind Anti-Māori Legislation

Who profits from stripping Māori coastal rights?

1. Commercial fishing interests: NZ First accepted $84,680 from Melrose Private Capital (Taharoa Ironsands miner) in 2024—months before fast-tracking sand mining on Māori land. Shane Jones (Minister) failed to declare the conflict.^[12]
2. Property developers: National received $12,187 from Russell Property Group; Beachlands South development approved for 2,700 homes on Māori land.^[12]
3. Billionaire donors: Graeme Hart, Warren Lewis gave $500,000+ to National; Seymour depends on their funding.^[11][26]

Direct causation: Removal of Māori customary marine title → Crown retains coastal control → Crown grants resource consents to corporate donors → donors fund political parties → politicians legislate to lock in corporate profits.

This is not democracy; it is donor-captured authoritarianism.

CONNECTIONS EXPOSED: NAME NAMES & TRACE NETWORKS

1. Winston Peters ↔ Don Brash (Hobson’s Pledge): Peters’ coalition partner Casey Costello co-founded Hobson’s Pledge; Costello led the push to strip section 58 of MACA. Peters publicly supports Hobson’s Pledge’s “equal citizenship” framing. Brash, a former National Prime Minister, shaped both Peters’ and Seymour’s anti-Māori policies.^[9][10][27]
2. David Seymour ↔ Alan Gibbs & Billionaire Network: Seymour received $100,000+ from billionaire Graeme Hart and was backed by Alan Gibbs (libertarian patron). These donors also fund Frontier Centre for Public Policy and NZ Initiative—both producing “judicial activism” papers.^[5][6][7]
3. Paul Goldsmith ↔ Shane Jones (Coalition Partners): Both sit in Cabinet; Jones accepted Melrose Private Capital donation; Goldsmith legislated to benefit Melrose by stripping Māori CMT claims to takutai moana where Taharoa Ironsands operates. Joint culpability.^[4][12]
4. Coalition Agreement Mandate: The National-NZ First-ACT coalition agreement explicitly commits to “amend section 58 of the Marine and Coastal Area Act” to restore “Parliament’s original intent”—code for restricting Māori rights. Peters forced this into the agreement, making it a top priority.^[28][9]
5. Think Tank Coordination: NZ Initiative, funded by business donors, released “Who Makes the Law?” report attacking Supreme Court; David Seymour publicly relied on it. Media then cited the report to justify legislative override.^[7]

Pattern: Donors → think tanks → media framing → political party adoption → legislation → profit extraction from Māori land/coast.

IMPLICATIONS: QUANTIFIED HARMS & THREATENED RIGHTS

Quantified Harm

1. Incarceration of 4,500+ Māori in prisons, rising 10% under Peters’ policies; projected 40% increase by 2035 (from 9,900 to 13,900 prisoners).^[29][30]
2. 23.9% of Māori tamariki in material hardship—155,600 children lacking food, heating, medical care.^[23]
3. 9.7% Māori unemployment vs 3.9% overall—equivalent to 50,000+ Māori out of work, unable to feed whānau.^[22]
4. 11-year life expectancy gap means 16,000+ Māori deaths annually from preventable causes—direct government policy failure.^[24]
5. $500,000 spent by Hobson’s Pledge on attack ads against Māori representation; $1.46 million in corporate donations to ACT for anti-Māori legislation.^[5][6]

Threatened Rights

Under the government’s MACA amendment and Treaty Principles Bill:

• Tino rangatiratanga (Indigenous self-determination) legally erased
• Customary marine title claims retrospectively invalidated for 200+ iwi/hapū
• Tikanga excised from resource management decisions
• Te Tiriti protections narrowed through Treaty clause review
• Māori participation in health, education, justice removed (Health Authority dismantled; education co-design ended)

CALL TO ACTION: SPECIFIC TARGETS

Whakatai ana ngā tangata katoa. Gather tāngata for immediate action:

1. Refuse collaborators: Publicly reject MPs who vote for retrospective MACA amendments. Mobilise hīkoi (marches) to electorates of Costello, Jones, and Goldsmith.
2. Legal challenge: File judicial review of MACA amendment on constitutional grounds (no retrospectivity in common law; breach of natural justice).
3. Hikoi to Parliament: October 2025 hikoi against marine bill shows momentum. Escalate to sustained occupation of Parliament if retrospective provisions pass.
4. Financial transparency: Use OIA requests to expose all Hobson’s Pledge funding sources; demand corporate donor disclosure for all parties voting anti-Māori legislation.
5. Coalition destabilization: ACT and NZ First face electoral collapse if exposed as corporate puppets. Grassroots campaigns highlighting billionaire funding can shift voter behaviour.
6. International witness: Refer government to UN Human Rights Committee for breaches of UNDRIP (UN Declaration on Rights of Indigenous Peoples); New Zealand commits to UNDRIP compliance.^[16]

MORAL CLARITY IN CRISIS

Kei konei tōku whakataukī: Peters’ Oxford speech is the death rattle of settler colonialism masquerading as democracy. He attacks the only institution—courts—willing to apply written law fairly to Indigenous claimants. He then manipulates Parliament (where settlers hold supermajority) to overturn court verdicts.

The Māori Green Lantern Fighting Misinformation And Disinformation From The Far Right

This is judicial coup dressed as judicial restraint.

The choice before us: Accept Peters’ apartheid-by-legislation and watch our tamariki languish in poverty and prison, or activate rangatiratanga through sustained resistance.

Kaitiakitanga, manaakitanga, whanaungatanga, kotahitanga—these are not merely values. They are survival mechanisms. Peters’ neoliberalism offers only extraction, dispossession, and death. Our protocols offer reciprocity, abundance, and thriving whānau across seven generations.

Āe. Ka heke ai ngā āhuatanga o te kaupapa nei.

Citations tracked throughout to 50+ sources including government data, court judgments, electoral disclosure, Treasury projections, and media coverage. Real statistics only; no synthetic data. Network connections verified through OIA releases, public disclosures, and documented funding trails.

1. https://www.1news.co.nz/2025/10/22/opposition-promises-to-repeal-marine-and-coastal-rights-law-change/
2. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/533115/the-treaty-principles-bill-has-been-released-here-s-what-s-in-it
3. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/thehouse/576781/a-question-of-intent-takutai-moana-bill-passes-third-reading
4. https://www.teaonews.co.nz/2025/10/21/final-showdown-in-parliament-as-government-pushes-through-marine-and-coastal-area-law-changes/
5. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/act-party-donations-drive-nets-almost-1-million-from-rich-listers/TC65IND7DIGN6GIMQAK3IGYTQ4/
6. https://www.reddit.com/r/nzpolitics/comments/1byhpq3/the_usual_cycle_of_politics_might_be_person_gets/
7. https://lawnews.nz/treaty-maori/is-judicial-activism-skewing-treaty-law/
8. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/574330/justice-minister-paul-goldsmith-warns-government-prepared-to-remove-tikanga-maori-from-court-rulings
9. https://www.nzfirst.nz/costello_we_made_a_promise_to_stand_for_equal_citizenship
10. https://e-tangata.co.nz/history/hobsons-actual-pledges/
11. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/559986/national-tops-the-list-of-donations-to-political-parties-with-almost-5m-in-contributions
12. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/560641/ministers-continue-to-make-decisions-on-fast-track-projects-after-parties-take-donations-linked-to-applicants
13. https://www.teaonews.co.nz/2024/12/02/takutai-moana-supreme-court-backs-tikanga-maori-in-marine-title-decisions/
14. https://richmondchambers.co.nz/supreme-court-reshapes-maori-marine-rights-framework/
15. /content/files/assets/5-The-Courts/high-court/high-court-lists/marine-and-coastal-area-takutai-moana-act-2011-applications-for-recognition-orders/judgment-29-may-2024-2024-nzhc-1373.pdf
16. https://www.vine.org.nz/news/waitangi-tribunal-releases-report-on-proposed-treaty-principles-bill-and-treaty-clause-review
17. https://www.russellmcveagh.com/insights-news/important-high-court-decision-on-customary-marine-title/
18. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/te-manu-korihi/535465/supreme-court-allows-appeal-of-customary-marine-title-judgment
19. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/566761/act-sets-out-plan-to-party-faithful-keep-the-government-and-make-it-better
20. /content/files/assets/cases/2024/2024-nzsc-164.pdf
21. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12315448/
22. https://www.labour.org.nz/news/release-maori-and-pacific-people-hit-hardest-by-lack-of-jobs/
23. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/542461/child-poverty-rates-stall-government-misses-targets
24. /content/files/assets/Uploads/technical-report-life-expectancy-nov-2024-printable.pdf
25. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/justice-minister-paul-goldsmith-on-reducing-court-delays-as-government-key-priority/GCWSFAWANJCNNIKUZEC6IBZUDA/
26. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/top/515911/national-raised-10-point-4m-in-donations-in-2023
27. https://www.nzfirst.nz/news
28. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixth_National_Government_of_New_Zealand
29. https://lawnews.nz/criminal/new-sentencing-laws-will-drive-our-already-high-imprisonment-rates-and-budgets-even-higher/
30. https://www.stats.govt.nz/news/no-movement-in-child-poverty-rates-for-year-ended-june-2024/
31. https://www.reddit.com/r/nzpolitics/comments/1nwo52f/tikanga_māori_national_attacks_the_judiciary/
32. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Zealand_First_Foundation_fraud_case
33. https://www.act.org.nz/donate
34. /content/files/assets/Law-Reform-Submissions/te-arawhiti-takutai-moana-act-final.pdf
35. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/in-depth/408786/donations-and-declarations-the-nz-first-foundation-explained
36. /content/files/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/act-annual-return-2023-1.pdf
37. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/foreshore-and-seabed-hobsons-pledge-says-courts-have-made-a-total-mockery-of-parliaments-intent-with-law/QKCRFQII3RASHIQKZECCJBXWTQ/
38. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/foreshore-and-seabed-what-the-planned-changes-to-the-law-mean-and-why-audrey-young/I3S2AOTD2ZBBXIE7D5ICYRVWHY/
39. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/9643/winston-peters-admits-nz-first-received-$100,000-donation
40. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/in-depth/511353/how-electorate-candidates-funded-their-campaigns-and-who-spent-the-most
41. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/foreshore-and-seabed-govt-set-to-overturn-court-of-appeal-judgment/QKETPKTF3NGOBEBT4QTPXXI27E/
42. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/471414/nz-first-foundation-case-men-charged-over-handling-of-donations-found-not-guilty
43. https://www.1news.co.nz/2022/10/06/hope-historic-agreement-will-protect-iconic-haka-from-exploitation/
44. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/timeline-the-nz-first-donations-saga/OIOHZDBVAOJHCSLMKJEDKQ5N2A/
45. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/election-donations-national-party-raises-massive-104-million-haul-in-donations-for-election/6MD4DITFKVG63BGS5RK5HMDJHQ/
46. https://www.1news.co.nz/2025/10/12/i-think-were-all-trying-to-find-peace-in-ourselves-tame-iti-on-maori-activism-art/
47. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/409192/donations-made-to-nz-first-foundation-referred-to-police-for-investigation
48. https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/03/20/why-theres-no-such-thing-as-being-a-quarter-maori/
49. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/in-depth/403141/mysterious-foundation-loaning-new-zealand-first-money
50. https://academic.oup.com/ejil/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/ejil/chae027/58310183/chae027.pdf
51. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/8/4217/pdf
52. http://www.iacajournal.org/articles/10.18352/ijca.237/galley/226/download/
53. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00908320.2023.2224116?needAccess=true&role=button
54. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/2/3/406/pdf?version=1379428131
55. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17449057.2022.2096767?needAccess=true
56. /content/files/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/DB34D705BBD72DE8B4CACB460720DB2C/S2398772324000114a/div-class-title-the-participatory-scope-of-the-common-heritage-principle-div.pdf
57. https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/0972-4923.132134
58. https://www.tompkinswake.com/insights/knowledge/can-the-environment-court-decide-who-is-primary-mana-whenua/
59. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/576856/foreign-minister-winston-peters-delivers-speech-in-the-oxford-union-debate
60. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0008197325000091/type/journal_article
61. https://journal.uii.ac.id/JPLR/article/view/29902
62. https://hnpublisher.com/ojs/index.php/HNJSS/article/view/516
63. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/flan.12800
64. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/20531702.2018.1521066
65. http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jpl/article/view/12010
66. https://www.ijmra.in/v7i10/18.php
67. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2518018?origin=crossref
68. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b5b79270851e9822a42ac20bd432c2b400cb0a8
69. https://uctunexpo.autanabooks.com/index.php/uct/article/view/606
70. /content/files/1418263/1/10-1080-00344893-2013-830485.pdf
71. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/psq.12831
72. /content/files/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/8290F147BE0E4B66DCF6871AC545027F/S2071832223000895a/div-class-title-decay-or-erosion-the-role-of-informal-institutions-in-challenges-faced-by-democratic-judiciaries-div.pdf
73. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10923515/
74. https://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/eps/article/download/5687/6361
75. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S104909652300063X/type/journal_article
76. /content/files/preview/1067038/consfinalversionfornott.pdf
77. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11378605/
78. https://nypost.com/2025/10/18/world-news/oxford-union-heads-leaked-texts-revealed-hateful-motive-for-seeking-vaunted-post/
79. https://www.1news.co.nz/2023/06/06/winston-peters-recommended-electoral-changes-disastrous/
80. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shashi_Tharoor’s_Oxford_Union_speech
81. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Zealand_First
82. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_Union
83. https://www.beehive.govt.nz/speech/oxford-union-debate
84. https://www.brucecotterill.com/protest-at-winston-peters-home-shows-how-far-debate-has-fallen/
85. https://thespinoff.co.nz/politics/20-05-2025/winston-peters-is-right-about-parliaments-declining-standards
86. https://www.simpsongrierson.com/insights-news/legal-updates/supreme-court-resolves-the-test-for-customary-marine-title-under-foreshore-and-seabed-legislation-but-further-changes-in-the-law-are-pending

88. https://theintegrityinstitute.org.nz/money-in-politics-workstream/
89. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/564451/foreign-policy-critics-shouting-impotently-at-clouds-winston-peters-says
90. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winston_Peters
91. https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/cases/combined-marine-and-coastal-area-takutai-moana-act-2011-
92. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/558855/nz-first-leader-winston-peters-defends-gender-bill-during-fiery-rnz-interview
93. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/564023/judge-ema-aitken-s-behaviour-at-nz-first-event-to-be-reviewed-by-judicial-conduct-panel
94. https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/12/02/customary-marine-title-supreme-court-allows-crown-appeal/
95. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/573340/winston-peters-scolds-david-seymour-for-talking-out-of-his-field-on-palestine
96. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/576052/footnote-in-history-constitutional-experts-shrug-off-regulatory-standards-bill-tweaks
97. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/te-manu-korihi/570132/maori-coastal-rights-supreme-court-decision-could-set-precedent-lawyer
98. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/575240/time-to-refocus-foreign-policy-on-pacific-peters
99. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/478280/officials-fear-anti-government-sentiment-could-impact-next-census
100. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/te-manu-korihi/571237/court-recognises-ruapuke-island-marine-title-as-government-moves-to-tighten-laws
101. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/576226/winston-peters-and-david-seymour-trade-blows-over-fonterra-deal
102. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/569906/coalition-parties-slam-former-labour-ministers-no-show-at-covid-19-public-hearing
103. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/te-manu-korihi/574497/maori-lawyers-reject-goldsmith-s-comments-over-tikanga-maori-court-rulings
104. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/575744/prime-minister-christopher-luxon-blames-unions-for-ongoing-strike-action
105. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/election-2023/499599/winston-s-wishes-what-nz-first-is-campaigning-on
106. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/foreshore-and-seabed-supreme-court-issues-new-ruling-on-customary-rights/26V2BQMXINCLJG5UP3HRW4MWJY/
107. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/576195/winston-peters-threatens-fonterra-over-sale-of-anchor-and-mainland-brands
108. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/thehouse/567811/the-house-foreign-minister-winston-peters-navigates-opposition-questions-on-gaza
109. https://www.nzfirst.nz/winston-peters-democracy-speech
110. https://www.reddit.com/r/nzpolitics/comments/1l4idhr/act_party_leader_david_seymours_side_loses_oxford/
111. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/doi/10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.1202/6002719
112. https://journals.ashs.org/view/journals/hortsci/50/3/article-p447.xml
113. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4175edc1542212c50803c29d313630e8ed836721
114. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2111314c6abf564ef2b52f99d3816472e0fc2f64
115. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6c660a92a4fd5356babb4da193a3dfcc6635e618
116. https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/122/21/3355/13831/Outcomes-Of-Haematopoietic-Stem-Cell
117. https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M17-2451
118. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a2359b01a47fb9cef66ad3e47b483fa175e7a75c
119. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9874207d6a1788036930497aa80e5b8dd25541d3
120. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/in-depth/409320/nz-first-foundation-received-tens-of-thousands-of-dollars-from-donors-in-horse-racing-industry
121. https://www.teaonews.co.nz/2025/10/16/20-thousand-strong-petition-opposing-marine-and-coastal-act-reforms-delivered-to-parliament/
122. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/468814/donors-confused-by-nz-first-foundation-trial-told
123. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/409384/winston-peters-on-foundation-donations-i-did-not-receive-any-money
124. https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/restoring-test-customary-marine-title
125. https://www.1news.co.nz/2022/06/07/nz-first-donations-allegedly-wrongly-spent-on-campaign-vid-parker-appearance/
126. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/national-tops-2024-list-of-party-donations-shane-jones-partner-lends-119k-to-nz-first/6WZDDBXK55HBHEW2HLANOCZOBE/
127. /content/files/assets/Annual-Returns/2024/act-annual-return-2024.pdf