“Jack Smith’s Testimony Exposes Trump’s Criminal Conspiracy and America’s Dying Rule of Law" - 1 January 2025

Mr Smith Is The Man - Thank You For Your Service To Justice

On December 17, 2025, former Special Counsel Jack Smith sat for an eight-hour deposition before the House Judiciary Committee—a hostile, Republican-controlled tribunal designed to intimidate, discredit, and ultimately silence the prosecutor who had spent two years building an airtight criminal case against Donald Trump. On December 31, 2025—New Year’s Eve—the committee released the 255-page transcript and accompanying video.

What they unleashed was not the exoneration Republicans desperately sought. It was a prosecutorial masterclass—a meticulous, evidence-based demolition of every lie Trump has told, every conspiracy theory his enablers have peddled, and every corrupt tactic his allies in Congress have deployed to shield him from accountability.

Smith’s testimony is the smoking gun. It is the proof. It is the indictment history will remember when Trump’s presidency is finally understood for what it truly is:

An authoritarian coup that succeeded because America’s institutions failed to hold a criminal accountable.

“President Trump Was By a Large Measure the Most Culpable”: Smith Names Trump as Chief Conspirator

Jack Smith did not mince words. He did not equivocate. He did not hide behind prosecutorial caution. Under oath, before a committee determined to destroy him, Smith stated with absolute clarity what the evidence proved:

“President Trump was by a large measure the most culpable and most responsible person in this conspiracy. These crimes were committed for his benefit. The attack that happened at the Capitol, part of this case, does not happen without him.”

This is documented in the transcript released by the House Judiciary Committee itself. Smith continued, as reported by the Associated Press:

“The other co-conspirators were doing this for his benefit. So in terms of why we would pursue a case against him, I entirely disagree with any characterization that our work was in any way meant to hamper him in the Presidential election.”

This was not political prosecution. This was criminal prosecution of the individual most responsible for attempting to overthrow American democracy.

Trump did not merely encourage the violence.

He caused it.

He exploited it.

And according to Smith’s sworn testimony,

Trump foresaw it.

When asked directly if Trump instructed people to storm the Capitol, Smith explained, as documented by NBC News:

“Our evidence is that he in the weeks leading up to January 6th created a level of distrust. He used that level of distrust to get people to believe fraud claims that weren’t true. He made false statements to State legislatures, to his supporters in all sorts of contexts and was aware in the days leading up to January 6th that his supporters were angry when he invited them and then he directed them to the Capitol.”

This is not inference. This is direct testimony from a career prosecutor who dedicated two years to investigating one of the gravest crimes in American history.

President Trump Was By a Large Measure the Most Culpable

“Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt”: Smith Had the Evidence to Convict Trump

Smith was unequivocal:

His investigation had gathered sufficient evidence not merely to indict Trump, but to convict him at trial.

As documented in multiple news outlets, Smith testified:

“The decision to bring charges against President Trump was mine, but the basis for nine of those charges rests entirely with President Trump and his actions, as alleged in the 10 indictments returned by grand juries in two different districts.”

Smith’s investigation, as he stated under oath,

“Developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power.”

This is the prosecutorial gold standard. This is not “we think he might be guilty.” This is “we can prove it in court, to a jury, beyond a reasonable doubt.” And Smith was prepared to do exactly that—until Trump’s 2024 election victory ended the prosecution.

The Special Counsel’s Report Volume 1, released January 7, 2025, provides exhaustive documentation of this evidence.

As Lawfare’s analysis notes, Smith’s report concludes:

“But for Mr. Trump’s election and imminent return to the Presidency, the Office assessed that the admissible evidence was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction at trial.”

Trump is guilty. The evidence proves it. And the only reason he is not in prison is because American voters returned him to power before justice could be served.

Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

Trump’s Lies Were Deliberate, Systematic, and Criminal

Smith’s testimony dismantles the fiction that Trump “genuinely believed” the election was stolen. The evidence Smith collected proves Trump knew his claims were false and continued making them anyway.

As NBC News documented from Smith’s testimony:

“When he was informed that a fraud claim was false, he did not cease making it.”

Smith elaborated on the specific nature of Trump’s lies, stating:

“These would be false claims about deceased voters, false claims about underage voters, and false claims about illegal immigrants voting. Generally, these false assertions were made about urban areas where he had lost votes in states that were otherwise closely contested.”

These were not errors. These were weapons. Trump deployed lies strategically, targeting urban areas—disproportionately communities of color—to delegitimize their votes.

Trump’s Lies Were Deliberate, Systematic, and Criminal

The Georgia “Dead Voters” Lie

Trump repeatedly claimed that more than 10,000 dead people voted in Georgia. According to Smith’s indictment, Trump made this claim on January 6, 2021, even though “just four days earlier, Georgia’s Secretary of State had publicly refuted this claim.” The actual number of deceased voters? Two. Not ten thousand. Two.

As Lawfare documented, Trump’s indictment states:

“The actual number was two, according to the indictment.”

The Georgia “Dead Voters” Lie

The Raffensperger Extortion Call

On January 2, 2021, Trump personally called Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger—a fellow Republican—and demanded he “find 11,780 votes”, the exact margin Trump needed to win Georgia. As Wikipedia’s extensively sourced account documents, this hour-long call was an explicit attempt to coerce a state official into committing election fraud.

Lawfare’s analysis of Smith’s indictment notes:

“Raffensperger objected to each of Trump’s claims. In a last ditch effort, Trump instructed the Raffensperger to ‘find 11,780 votes,’ even insinuating that he and his counsel ‘could be subject to criminal prosecution if they failed to find election fraud as he demanded.’”

This was not a political disagreement. This was criminal extortion.

The Raffensperger Extortion Call

Rudy Giuliani Admitted His Claims Were False—But Continued Spreading Them Anyway

One of the most damning revelations from Smith’s testimony involves Rudy Giuliani, Trump’s personal attorney and chief propagandist of election fraud lies. According to CNN’s report on Smith’s testimony:

“Smith informed the committee that Giuliani, one of the uncharged co-conspirators in the election interference investigation, did not genuinely believe the allegations of voter fraud he propagated during the 2020 presidential election. ‘In fact, during our interview, he retracted several of those claims,’ Smith recounted. ‘He described them as errors or exaggerations, even regarding the accusation against Ruby Freeman, which essentially ruined this poor woman’s life by labeling her a vote scammer.’”

Ruby Freeman and her daughter Shaye Moss—two Black election workers in Georgia—were targeted by Giuliani’s lies. Giuliani falsely accused them of ballot fraud, showing a misleadingly edited video that purported to show them “counting ‘suitcases’ of illegal ballots.” The video was fabricated. The accusations were lies. And the consequences were catastrophic.

Freeman and Moss received death threats. They were forced into hiding. Their lives were destroyed. And Giuliani knew his accusations were false.

Giuliani eventually conceded in court filings that he had made false statements. A jury ordered him to pay $148 million in damages to Freeman and Moss. Giuliani subsequently filed for bankruptcy.

But the damage was done. And Trump amplified every one of Giuliani’s lies.

Rudy Giuliani Admitted His Claims Were False

“Absolutely Not”: The First Amendment Does Not Protect Trump’s Criminal Conduct

Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee repeatedly attempted to argue that Trump’s false election claims were protected political speech under the First Amendment. Smith systematically destroyed this argument.

When asked directly if Trump’s misleading statements fell under First Amendment protections, Smith responded, as NBC News documented:

“Absolutely not.”

Smith elaborated:

“There is no historical precedent for what President Trump did in this instance. As we stated in the indictment, he was entitled to express his belief that he won the election. He was even entitled to falsely claim victory. However, he was not permitted to breach federal law by utilizing knowingly false assertions about election fraud to undermine a legitimate government process.”

This distinction is critical. Trump had the right to say he believed he won. He did not have the right to use those lies as part of a criminal conspiracy to overturn the election.

As First Amendment scholar analysis notes:

“Smith recognized Trump’s right ‘to speak publicly about the 2020 presidential election and even to claim, falsely, that there had been outcome-determinative fraud during the election and that he had won.’ Smith believed, however, that the evidence was sufficient to show that Trump had not only made false statements, but that he had made them knowingly and in furtherance of a conspiracy to obstruct the election results.”

This is not a novel legal theory. This is established law. Fraud is not protected speech. Incitement to violence is not protected speech. And using lies to obstruct a federal proceeding—the certification of electoral votes—is a federal crime.

Absolutely Not

January 6 Was Not a Protest. It Was an Armed Insurrection. Trump Caused It.

Let us be brutally clear about what January 6, 2021, actually was. It was not a “protest.” It was not “tourists visiting the Capitol.” It was a violent insurrection designed to prevent the constitutional certification of an election.

The Violence Was Real

As Britannica’s documented account confirms:

“Approximately 140 Capitol and Metropolitan police officers were criminally assaulted” by the mob.

The casualties were horrific:

• Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick, 42, died from injuries sustained defending the Capitol. He was reportedly “bludgeoned in the head with a fire extinguisher,” according to ProPublica’s investigation of Parler videos.
• Four additional officers who responded to the attack died by suicide within seven months.
• 174 police officers were injured, many severely. Officers were “beaten with deadly weapons (bats, pipes, and flag poles), sprayed with chemical irritants, or crushed and trampled,” according to Britannica.
• One officer was “crushed in a door while defending the Capitol tunnel” and another was “pulled into the mob and assaulted—dragged down the Capitol steps, beaten with pipes, stunned with a Taser, sprayed with chemical irritants,” according to Lawfare’s documented timeline.
• Within 36 hours, five people died.
• Damage to the Capitol exceeded $2.7 million.

Jan 6

The Mob Was Armed

Smith testified, according to The Independent:

“There were people who certainly had weapons at the Capitol. That I recall with certainty. And there’s people who used weapons, whether they be poles or sticks or other weapons, against police officers. I know there was one officer who they took his gun.”

Smith added:

“The use of weapons against members of law enforcement, it was outrageous.”

Trump Did Nothing to Stop It

The most damning evidence of Trump’s culpability is not what he did on January 6—it is what he refused to do.

According to Lawfare’s timeline compiled from House investigations:

Within 15 minutes of Trump leaving the stage, violence was occurring at the Capitol. Trump was informed. And he did not:

• Call the Secretary of Defense
• Contact the Attorney General
• Reach out to the Department of Homeland Security
• Order deployment of the National Guard

Instead, as Lawfare documented, “at 2:03 p.m., Trump made a call to Rudy Giuliani that lasted about eight minutes” while the Capitol was under siege.

Trump watched the violence on television from his private dining room and “was largely disengaged as the nation’s capital descended into unprecedented scenes of chaos,” the New Zealand Herald reported.

When Trump finally appeared on video at 4:22 p.m.—more than three hours after the violence began—he did not condemn the mob. He told them:

“We have to have peace. So go home. We love you. You’re very special.” He praised them as “special people” and said he “understood their pain,” the NZ Herald noted.

He validated their criminality rather than condemn it.

Trump Did Nothing to Stop It

“Our Case Was Built on Republicans”: Trump’s Own Allies Testified Against Him

One of the most powerful elements of Smith’s testimony was his explanation of who provided the most damning evidence against Trump:

Republicans.

As the Associated Press reported, Smith stated:

“We had an elector in Pennsylvania, a former congressman, who was slated to be an elector for Trump, stated that what they were attempting was an effort to overthrow the government and was illegal. Our case was fundamentally built on Republicans who prioritized their loyalty to the country over their party.”

Smith told the committee, as Politico documented:

“The evidence that I felt was most powerful was the evidence that came from people in his own party who put country before party and were willing to tell the truth to him, even though it could mean trouble for them.”

These were not Democrats with partisan axes to grind. These were Trump’s own allies—people who had supported him, worked for him, believed in him—who testified that what Trump was doing was criminal.

This included:

• Arizona House Speaker Rusty Bowers, who refused Trump’s pressure to overturn Arizona’s results
• Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, who rejected Trump’s extortion
• Trump’s own Attorney General William Barr, who told the January 6 Committee that Trump’s fraud claims were “bullshit”
• Vice President Mike Pence, who refused to obstruct the certification despite Trump’s pressure

These Republicans put country over party. And Trump has sought revenge against every single one of them.

Our Case Was Built on Republicans

“I Have No Doubt the President Wants Retribution Against Me”: Trump’s Authoritarian Revenge Campaign

Smith’s testimony concluded with a chilling acknowledgment of the danger he now faces. When asked if he believed Trump would seek retribution, Smith responded, according to the BBC:

“I have no doubt that the president wants to seek retribution against me.”

Smith added, as documented in multiple sources:

“I remain grateful for the counsel, judgment, and advice of my team as I executed my responsibilities. I am both saddened and angered that President Trump has sought revenge against career prosecutors, FBI agents, and support staff simply for doing their jobs and for having worked on those cases.”

This is not hypothetical. Trump’s revenge is already underway.

As the BBC reported, Smith testified that

“the Justice Department now aims to pursue retribution against anyone involved in cases against President Trump.”

The evidence is overwhelming:

• The DOJ has opened investigations into charging decisions made in January 6 cases
• More than a dozen prosecutors have been fired
• Trump’s team has attempted to suspend security clearances for firm employees who worked with Smith

During his testimony, Smith became emotional when discussing the persecution of his colleagues, stating according to CNN:

“What has occurred to career prosecutors and FBI agents is deplorable. It goes against the rule of law. It contradicts the values I believe we hold as a nation.”

This is authoritarianism. This is what happens when a criminal seizes control of the justice system designed to prosecute him.

I Have No Doubt the President Wants Retribution Against Me

The Rot Is Institutional: Judge Cannon’s Obstruction and the Suppressed Classified Documents Report

Smith’s testimony also exposes the complicity of Trump-appointed judges in obstructing justice. Throughout his testimony, Smith repeatedly stated he was constrained in what he could say because “volume two is still under wraps”—referring to his classified documents investigation report.

That report remains suppressed by Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee to the Southern District of Florida. As ProPublica documented, Cannon “threw out Smith’s prosecution of Trump for alleged mishandling of classified documents” by ruling that the special counsel position itself was unconstitutional—a decision so radical that even Republican legal scholars recognized it as extreme.

ProPublica’s analysis noted:

“A reasonable member of the public could conclude, as many have, that the dismissal was the culmination of Judge Cannon’s many efforts to undermine and derail the prosecution of this case.”

Cannon has kept Smith’s second report “on ice for a year with no explanation,” preventing the American public from learning the full extent of Trump’s criminality involving classified documents.

This is not judicial independence. This is judicial corruption in service of a criminal president.

The Rot Is Institutional

Trump Is Guilty. Justice Has Been Murdered. Democracy Is Dying.

Jack Smith’s testimony is the definitive historical record of Trump’s crimes. It is the evidence that should have convicted Trump at trial. It is the proof that American democracy was attacked by its own president—and that American institutions failed to hold him accountable.

Smith stated under oath:

“Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power.”

Trump knew his election fraud claims were false. He made them anyway. He incited violence. He refused to stop it. And he exploited it to try to remain in power.

Trump is guilty. The evidence proves it. And the only reason he is not in prison is because he won the 2024 election before justice could be served.

Now Trump controls the Department of Justice. Now Trump controls the FBI. Now Trump is purging prosecutors and investigators who dared to hold him accountable. Now Trump is seeking “retribution” against career public servants who did their jobs.

This is not democracy. This is autocracy.

Jack Smith’s testimony will stand as the historical record when future generations ask: “How did America allow a criminal to seize power?”

The answer is now clear:

Because justice moved too slowly. Because institutions prioritized procedure over accountability. Because a political party chose power over principle. And because American voters returned a criminal to office before the rule of law could stop him.

Smith’s final words in his Special Counsel Report will haunt American history:

“But for Mr. Trump’s election and imminent return to the Presidency, the Office assessed that the admissible evidence was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction at trial.”

Trump is guilty. America chose him anyway. And now the rule of law is dead.

Trump Is Guilty As Fuck

Koha—Supporting Truth and Accountability

This mahi—exposing misinformation, dismantling authoritarian narratives, and demanding accountability from power—requires resources. Corporate media will not fund this work. Governments will not support voices that challenge their authority. That leaves whānau.

Three pathways exist for those who wish to support this kaupapa:

Koha (voluntary contribution): For those who wish to support this mahi directly, please visit Koha—Support The Māori Green Lantern.

Substack subscription: For those who wish to receive essays directly and support through subscription, join The Māori Green Lantern on Substack.

Direct bank transfer: For those who prefer direct bank transfer, account details are: HTDM, account number 03-1546-0415173-000.

Every koha signals that whānau are ready to fund the accountability that Crown and corporate structures will not provide. It signals that rangatiratanga includes the power to fund our own truth tellers.

Kia kaha, whānau. Stay vigilant. Stay connected. And if you are able, consider a koha to ensure this voice continues.

Ivor Jones The Māori Green Lantern Fighting Misinformation And Disinformation From The Far Right