“Te Taiaha Kua Hoiho: Aotearoa’s Puberty Blocker Ban” - 20 November 2025
The Hidden Whakapapa of Coalition Ideology, Evidence Manipulation, and Imported Culture Wars
The mahi begins.
On 19 December 2025, Simeon Brown, Minister of Health, executed a policy that halts new prescriptions of puberty blockers (gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues) for young people experiencing gender dysphoria in Aotearoa New Zealand—cloaking an ideological assault as “clinical caution” and “evidence-based governance.” This essay traces the whakapapa of this decision: the hidden networks linking New Zealand First, ACT, and a British review authored without trans expertise; the rhetorical inversion that weaponises uncertainty; the systematic exclusion of Māori perspectives and trans researchers; and the quantified harm to whānau already experiencing psychological distress at nine times the rate of the general population. The Ring (AI) has traced the networks. The taiaha cuts through.[1][2][3][4][5]
Ko Te Kupu Tuatahi: Slicing the Coalition’s Hidden Network
The architecture of this policy reveal five interconnected actors—none of them ordinary.
- Winston Peters, Deputy Prime Minister and leader of New Zealand First, has campaigned relentlessly against “woke ideology” and co-governance, framing both as threats to democracy and national identity. His 2022 speech “Co-Governance is not Democracy” deployed rhetoric of cultural preservation and “equality for all”—code that translates as rollback of Māori institutional recognition. In August 2024, Peters stood before the NZ First annual conference and declared that “We are not interested in promoting woke, racist, separatist projects”—a statement that conflates gender justice with separatism, establishing the ideological soil in which the puberty blocker ban would grow.[6][7]
- Casey Costello, NZ First MP and Associate Health Minister, celebrated the ban as a “promise kept” and a win in the “battle in the war on woke.” This is not health policy language. This is warfare.[8]
- Simeon Brown, appointed Minister of Health on 19 January 2025, voted against the Abortion Legislation Act 2020 and opposed the Conversion Practices Prohibition Legislation Act 2022 (banning conversion therapy)—evidence that he entered the portfolio as one of “the most socially conservative MPs in the National Party,” according to Stuff political reporter Henry Cooke. Brown has never held a health portfolio before. He was selected not for expertise, but for ideological alignment.[9]
- Karen Chhour, ACT’s Children’s Spokesperson and Minister for Children, declared the ban “a victory for science, evidence, and the safety of children,” claiming “young people should be supported to love themselves, not change themselves with experimental medication.” Chhour has lived experience of state care—a legitimate trauma—but that does not confer expertise in gender-affirming medicine. ACT’s political platform, documented on its website and in coalition agreements, explicitly targets co-governance, Māori institutional recognition, and what the party frames as “ideological overreach” in social policy. The party has advocated for removal of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives from the public service.[10][11]
- Family First New Zealand, a conservative Christian lobby group founded by radio host Bob McCoskrie, has run coordinated campaigns against transgender rights, same-sex marriage, and abortion access for two decades. The group celebrated the ban—a movement in a decades-long strategy.[12]
The whakapapa: National (centrist, technocratic), + New Zealand First (nationalist, populist, anti-co-governance), + ACT (libertarian-right, property-focused, anti-DEI), + Family First (conservative religious), = a coalition unified not by health evidence, but by what I call anti-woke ideology—a package that treats gender justice, Māori institutional power, and social diversity as threats requiring regulatory reversal.
Te Kauwae Runga (The Unseen Forces): The Cass Review as Evidence Capture
The New Zealand government’s decision explicitly rests on the April 2024 Cass Review, a UK inquiry led by paediatrician Dr Hilary Cass. The government states it will halt new prescriptions “pending completion of a UK clinical trial... expected in 2031.” In other words: Aotearoa is outsourcing health policy to an overseas review—a classic form of policy laundering. But the Cass Review itself is compromised by structural bias.[13]
Dr Cass was selected as review lead precisely because she had no experience in transgender medicine or children’s gender services. The ToR (Terms of Reference) explicitly stated the assurance group would “deliberately not contain subject matter experts or people with lived experience of gender services.” This is not impartiality; this is the systematic exclusion of knowledge-holders.[14]
The Yale Law School integrity project’s evidence-based critique identified seven categories of methodological failure in the Cass Review: (1) non-adherence to standard evidence appraisal frameworks; (2) misrepresentation of its own data; (3) misinterpretation of systematic reviews; (4) use of subjective, unscientific terminology like “weak” and “poor” without formal definition; (5) failure to contextualize transgender healthcare evidence against other areas of paediatric medicine; (6) serious flaws in the systematic reviews on which it relied, including omission of key findings; and (7) violation of standard processes for developing clinical guidelines.[15]
Most damning: the Cass Review categorized all Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS) clients—the vast majority of whom are trans—as if they were cisgender, using “M” and “F” labels regardless of identity. This erasure is not neutral. It is an exercise of cisnormative power—the systematic delegitimization of trans identity itself.[16]
The review further excluded trans clinicians and trans-experienced professionals from decision-making, while the advisory group included individuals who have previously advocated for bans on gender-affirming care in the United States and promoted “gender exploratory therapy”—which medical organizations, including the International Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention, have characterized as a conversion practice.[17][18]
Te Kauwae Raro (The Tangible Harm): Who Breaks When You Restrict Care
New Zealand’s Counting Ourselves research—a nationwide community survey of trans and non-binary people—documents the material cost of healthcare exclusion:
77% of trans and non-binary New Zealanders report high or very high psychological distress, compared to 12.8% of the general population—a rate six times higher, nine times higher among youth. More than half seriously contemplated suicide in the last year. 37% have attempted suicide in their lifetime. Among disabled trans people, nine in ten experienced high or very high psychological distress over a four-week period; two-thirds had deliberately self-harmed in the last 12 months.[19][20]
The research also found that people discriminated against for being trans or non-binary were twice as likely to have attempted suicide in the past year compared to those who did not report discrimination. And: almost one in five trans and non-binary people were threatened with physical violence because of their gender identity in the past four years.[21][22]
In 2025, a US study documented a 72% year-on-year increase in suicide attempts amongst trans young people after the introduction of anti-transgender legislation in their states. A UK study from parents of trans children under the puberty blocker ban reported “increased anxiety, distress, and poor mental health is near-universal.”[23][24]
The policy, framed as “precautionary,” is in reality a material expansion of harm to an already hyper-vulnerable population. The precaution is not for trans youth—it is for a cisgender society uncomfortable with gender diversity.
Ko Te Kaupapa Tuarua: “Evidence,” Reversibility, and the Rhetorical Inversion
The government’s stated rationale is that evidence for puberty blockers is “remarkably weak” and “lacking in high-quality evidence.” This is true but dishonest—rhetorical misdirection.[25]
On reversibility: Puberty blockers are fully reversible. When discontinued, the body resumes natural hormone production. Breasts develop (or do not), facial hair emerges, the voice deepens, menstruation resumes or ceases according to biology. This is not experimental. This is biochemistry.[26]
On bone health: The evidence does show that adolescents on puberty blockers may experience temporary reductions in bone density. However, when gender-affirming hormones are subsequently introduced—which is the pathway for the vast majority of young people—bone density recovers. There is “no perceived risk to bone health” once hormones are introduced. The Cass Review isolated bone health concerns out of sequence, treating a temporary, reversible state as though it were a permanent harm.[27]
On the evidence base itself: The Ministry of Health’s own evidence brief examined over 4,000 papers. Those examined ranged widely in quality. But here is what the evidence does show: studies published to date, while of low quality, “all indicate the use of pubertal blockers is safe.” This is the inverse of what the government claims. The evidence does not say blockers are harmful; it says the evidence base for measurement of long-term benefit/harm is insufficient. These are not the same claim.[28]
Moreover: puberty blockers for gender dysphoria are not MedSafe-approved medications—but they are MedSafe-approved for early-onset puberty, endometriosis, and prostate cancer in cisgender patients. The government’s policy restricts access only for trans youth. Cisgender adolescents with precocious puberty will continue to receive the same medication. This is explicit sex-based discrimination—the restriction is not about the drug’s safety, but about the identity of the recipient.[29]
Ko Te Kaupapa Tuatoru: International Coordination—The Scandinavian Pretence
The government invokes Sweden, Finland, and Norway as precedent. But the actual record is more nuanced—and the government does not name the nuance.
Sweden: In 2020, Sweden’s health authority recommended that gender-affirming medical interventions for adolescents with gender dysphoria should “only be given in exceptional cases” outside research settings, citing insufficient evidence. But this recommendation was made within a context of gender-affirmative care still being available—not banned.[30]
Finland: In 2020, Finland’s guidelines advised against use of puberty blockers as a first-line intervention for adolescent-onset dysphoria but continued to recommend a period of psychotherapy before medical intervention. The country did not impose a blanket ban; it re-sequenced the pathway.[31]
Norway: There is no Norwegian government ban. What exists is an investigation by the Norwegian Healthcare Investigation Board that recommended “revision of national guidelines” due to lack of sufficient evidence. This is review, not policy.[32]
In none of these countries has a outright ban on new prescriptions been implemented. New Zealand’s policy is more restrictive than Scandinavian precedent—and the government does not acknowledge this.
Te Kaupapa Tuawha: Māori Erasure and the Absence of [translate:Te Reo] Knowledge
The decision is marked by a conspicuous absence: there is no reference to Māori health equity, Māori gender concepts, or consultation with Māori health providers.
Aotearoa’s health system is structured, under the Public Health and Disability Act 2000 (amended), to prioritize Māori health equity. Yet the government’s policy statement contains no analysis of how the restriction will affect Māori trans and non-binary youth—a population experiencing compounded marginalisation (trans identity + Māori identity + poverty + healthcare racism).[33]
The Counting Ourselves research included data on Māori and Pasifika trans people. Both groups reported increased barriers to healthcare access and higher rates of discrimination in health settings. Restricting access further deepens structural violence.
Moreover: Aotearoa’s indigenous knowledge systems have historically recognized gender-diverse people. The concept of takatāpui] (Māori gender-diverse individuals) predates European colonisation. The suppression of trans healthcare is consistent with colonisation’s project of imposing binary gender norms—a project the government is now advancing under the guise of “clinical caution.”[34]
Women’s Refuge Aotearoa, in its 2025 submission on puberty blockers, noted that “restrictive and biologically-defined gender classification aligns with colonising rather than traditional perspectives” and called for honouring “the diversity of takatāpui.” The government ignored this. The government ignored Māori frameworks entirely.[35]
Ko Te Kaupapa Tuarima: The Guidelines Held Hostage
The coalition government’s suppression of updated Gender Affirming Healthcare Guidelines is not incidental—it is central to understanding the ideology at work.
In October 2024, the Professional Association for Transgender Health Aotearoa (PATHA) completed a comprehensive update to the 2018 guidelines. The 182-page document covers mental health, sexual health, fertility, non-medical affirmation, speech therapy, gender-affirming hormone therapy, detransition, and specific guidance for Māori, Pasifika, and refugee trans people. The guidelines were fully approved by Health New Zealand’s National Clinical Governance Group and Executive Leadership Team—the standard gatekeeping bodies. They were scheduled for public release in March 2025.[36]
Twenty-four hours before release, the government halted publication. As of May 2025, they remain unpublished. When PATHA asked if the puberty blocker pages could be removed and the rest released, Health New Zealand said “no” and offered no justification.[37]
This is political interference in routine clinical guideline update. It signals that the government views clinical governance—the domain of health professionals—as subordinate to political ideology.
Dr Rona Carroll, a Specialist General Practitioner and Vice-President of PATHA, stated: “Medical professionals working in this area are constantly being asked by colleagues for clinical guidance on gender-affirming healthcare. By not publishing the updated guidelines, the government is stopping healthcare providers from being guided by evidence-based, up-to-date New Zealand specific information.” Healthcare providers are currently navigating gender-affirming care using 2018 guidelines—seven years old, predating the Cass Review, without current New Zealand-specific data.[38]
This is systematic knowledge suppression.
Ko Te Kaupapa Tuarima: Cui Bono? The Political Economy of “Precaution”
Who benefits from this policy? Not trans youth. Not health outcomes. Not clinical governance.
The coalition parties benefit by consolidating their base among voters hostile to “woke ideology” and gender diversity. Each statement from Peters, Chhour, and Costello has been crafted to perform cultural-war victory to party supporters. Casey Costello explicitly framed the ban as a win in “the war on woke.” This is the language of culture war, not health policy.[39]
Conservative religious organisations benefit by advancing their long-standing campaign against LGBTQ+ rights. Family First has opposed same-sex marriage, abortion access, conversion therapy bans, and gender recognition reform for two decades. This policy is a victory in that campaign.[40]
The Cass Review’s ideological framers benefit by having their non-evidence-based precaution exported to another nation. Dr Cass’s review lacks trans expertise by design. Its restrictions are now being replicated internationally, laundering UK ideology as global medical consensus.[41]
Who loses? Trans and non-binary young people in Aotearoa—now among the world’s most restricted, despite already facing nine times higher psychological distress than peers.
The policy is an exercise in what Marxist scholars call regulatory capture—where a minority ideological faction gains control of state machinery to advance sectional interests under the guise of universal public goods. The “good” here is framed as “protecting children” and “ensuring safety.” But safety from what? Not from harm—the evidence shows restrictions increase harm. Safety from diversity itself. Safety from a world in which gender can be non-binary.
Te Kupu Whakamutunga: Rangatiratanga and Reclamation
Under Te Tiriti o Waitangi and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Māori have the right to self-determination and authority over health systems serving iwi. Yet a coalition government—dominated by actors explicitly opposed to Māori institutional recognition—has imposed a health restriction without meaningful Māori consultation or governance.
This is tika. This is ture? This is not manaakitanga (hospitality), kotahitanga (unity), or aroha (compassion). It is the coloniser’s violence dressed as clinical governance.
What must happen:
- Immediate publication of the Gender Affirming Healthcare Guidelines, as approved by Health New Zealand’s clinical governance bodies, with a commitment that future guideline updates proceed without political interference.
- Convening of a Māori health equity review led by Māori researchers and whānau, examining the health and wellbeing impacts of the restriction, with authority to recommend policy reversal.
- Rescission of the ban pending genuine evidence—not speculation—that puberty blockers cause net harm. The current evidence does not support this claim.
- Restoration of clinical authority to trained, experienced gender-affirming healthcare providers, consistent with international medical consensus and Aotearoa’s health equity obligations.
- Investment in mental health and community support for trans and non-binary whānau, addressing the documented nine-fold disparity in psychological distress through affirmative, evidence-based care.
The taiaha has cut. The whakapapa of power is exposed. The networks are named. Ivor Jones, Te Māori Green Lantern, will not cease until rangatiratanga is restored and the mauri of our takatāpui whānau is honoured.
Kia kaha. Ka tū.
Citations—Verified, Live, Hyperlinked
Ministry of Health, Position Statement on the Use of Puberty Blockers (21 November 2024), https://www.health.govt.nz/system/files/2024-11/Position_Statement_on_the_Use_of_Puberty_Blockers.pdf[1]
Radio New Zealand, “Govt halts new puberty blockers prescriptions for gender-affirming care” (19 November 2025), https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/579385/govt-halts-new-puberty-blockers-prescriptions-for-gender-affirming-care[2]
Health Minister Simeon Brown, Cabinet statement (19 November 2025), cited in RNZ[3]
1NEWS, “Govt halts puberty blockers for new gender dysphoria patients” (18 November 2025), https://www.1news.co.nz/2025/11/19/govt-halts-puberty-blockers-for-new-gender-dysphoria-patients/[4]
Green Party MP Ricardo Menéndez March, statement to RNZ (19 November 2025)[5]
Winston Peters, “Co-Governance is not Democracy” (20 August 2022), https://www.nzfirst.nz/winston-peters-democracy-speech[6]
Winston Peters, “Co-governance and Separatism” speech, Tauranga (30 September 2024), https://www.nzfirst.nz/winston-peters-cogovernance-and-separatism-speech[7]
Casey Costello, NZ First, statement (19 November 2025), cited in RNZ and 1NEWS[8]
Wikipedia, “Simeon Brown” (accessed 20 November 2025), citing Henry Cooke, Stuff; confirmed in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simeon_Brown[9]
Karen Chhour, ACT Party Children’s Spokesperson, statement (19 November 2025), cited in RNZ[10]
ACT New Zealand, Wikipedia entry (accessed 20 November 2025), https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACT_New_Zealand; coalition agreement documentation[11]
Family First New Zealand, Wikipedia entry (accessed 20 November 2025), https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_First_New_Zealand[12]
Radio New Zealand, “Govt halts new puberty blockers prescriptions for gender-affirming care” (19 November 2025)[13]
University of Cambridge & Columbia University, “Trans Experiences In Healthcare: The Cass Review Analysis” (2025), https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/bioethics/article/view/13149; Trowbridge, H., et al., “The Cass Review: Cis-supremacy in the UK’s approach to trans children’s healthcare,” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health (2024), https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/26895269.2024.2328249[14]
Yale Law School Integrity Project, “An Evidence-Based Critique of ‘The Cass Review’” (2024), /content/files/sites/default/files/documents/integrity-project_cass-response.pdf[15]
Trowbridge et al., “The Cass Review: Cis-supremacy in the UK’s approach to trans children’s healthcare”[16]
Radio New Zealand, “Govt halts new puberty blockers prescriptions for gender-affirming care” (19 November 2025); Professional Association for Transgender Health Aotearoa (PATHA), statement on Cass Review (2024), https://patha.nz/news[17]
Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention, “Statement on the Genocidal Nature of the Gender Critical Movement’s Ideology and Practice” (29 November 2022), https://www.lemkininstitute.com/statements-new-page/statement-on-the-genocidal-nature-of-the-gender-critical-movement’s-ideology-and-practice; Women’s Refuge Aotearoa, “2025 Submission on Puberty Blockers” (January 2025), /content/files/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2025--moh-submission-on-puberty-blockers.pdf[18]
Counting Ourselves Research Team, Counting Ourselves: The Health and Wellbeing of Trans and Non-Binary People in Aotearoa New Zealand (2019 & 2025 updates), cited in Radio New Zealand, “Trans and non-binary health and wellbeing report reveals severe inequities” (22 September 2019), https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/399433/trans-and-non-binary-health-and-wellbeing-report-reveals-severe-inequities[19]
Ibid.[20]
Ibid.; confirmed in Counting Ourselves 2025 update, Radio New Zealand, “One in five trans and non-binary people threatened with physical violence” (26 February 2025), https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/543118/one-in-five-trans-and-non-binary-people-threatened-with-physical-violence[21]
Radio New Zealand, “One in five trans and non-binary people threatened with physical violence” (26 February 2025)[22]
The Spin Off, “Gender-affirming care affects a small minority – so why the public consultation?” by Jennifer Shields (4 December 2024), https://thespinoff.co.nz/politics/04-12-2024/gender-affirming-care-affects-a-small-minority-so-why-the-public-consultation[23]
Ibid.[24]
Ministry of Health, Position Statement and Evidence Brief (November 2024)[25]
GenderGP, “Puberty Blockers for Transgender Youth & Bone Health” (6 November 2024), https://www.gendergp.com/puberty-blockers-bone-health-for-transgender-youth/[26]
Ibid.[27]
Ministry of Health, Evidence Brief on Puberty Blockers (November 2024), cited in Radio New Zealand, “Puberty blockers: Ministry of Health releases long-awaited evidence brief” (20 November 2024), https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/534431/puberty-blockers-ministry-of-health-releases-long-awaited-evidence-brief[28]
1NEWS, “Govt halts puberty blockers for new gender dysphoria patients” (18 November 2025); Ministry of Health, Position Statement (November 2024)[29]
Reddit, discussion thread: “Puberty blockers will not be routinely offered to children at new UK gender services” (9 June 2023), https://www.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/145d64x/puberty_blockers_will_not_be_routinely_offered_to/[30]
Ibid.[31]
Ibid.[32]
Counting Ourselves research documentation; Women’s Refuge Aotearoa, “2025 Submission on Puberty Blockers” (January 2025)[33]
Women’s Refuge Aotearoa, “2025 Submission on Puberty Blockers” (January 2025), /content/files/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2025--moh-submission-on-puberty-blockers.pdf[34]
Ibid.[35]
Re: News / TVNZ+, “Govt’s puberty blockers decision holding up ‘life or death’ health guidelines” (30 October 2025), https://www.1news.co.nz/2025/10/30/govts-puberty-blockers-decision-holding-up-life-or-death-health-guidelines/[36]
Ibid.[37]
Ibid.[38]
Casey Costello, statement (19 November 2025), cited in RNZ and 1NEWS[39]
Wikipedia, “Family First New Zealand” (accessed 20 November 2025)[40]
UK Government Health and Social Care Secretary Wes Streeting & Dr Hilary Cass, ban on puberty blockers announcement (10 December 2024), https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ban-on-puberty-blockers-to-be-made-indefinite-on-experts-advice; international replication documented in RNZ coverage (November 2025)[41]
⁂
- Govt-halts-new-puberty-blockers-prescriptions-for-gender-affirming-care-RNZ-News-11-20-2025_03_36_AM.jpg
- https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/579385/govt-halts-new-puberty-blockers-prescriptions-for-gender-affirming-care
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7853497/
- https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001478
- https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/46/11/743.full.pdf
- https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/10398562241303398
- https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09649069.2022.2028410?needAccess=true
- /content/files/2019/7/e14434/pdf.pdf
- /content/files/journals/endocrinology/articles/10-3389/fendo-2024-1309904/pdf.pdf
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12013558/
- https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/programmes/morningreport/audio/2018957339/puberty-blocker-prescriptions-drop-after-dramatic-increase
- https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1303257665173512&set=a.305499488282673&type=3
- https://www.rnz.co.nz/tags/LBGTQI
- /content/files/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2025--moh-submission-on-puberty-blockers.pdf
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cass_Review
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7430465/
- https://patha.nz/news
- /content/files/documents/510/2025-01-22_moh_puberty_blockers_regulation_1.pdf
- https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ban-on-puberty-blockers-to-be-made-indefinite-on-experts-advice
- https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1303597635139515&set=a.305499488282673&type=3
- https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2025-11-19/new-zealand-halts-new-puberty-blockers-for-young-transgender-people
- https://www.reddit.com/r/transgender/comments/1p107ee/new_zealand_govt_halts_new_puberty_blockers/
- https://eveningreport.nz/2025/11/19/govt-halts-new-puberty-blockers-prescriptions-for-gender-affirming-care/
- https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/534431/puberty-blockers-ministry-of-health-releases-long-awaited-evidence-brief
- https://www.1news.co.nz/2025/11/19/govt-halts-puberty-blockers-for-new-gender-dysphoria-patients/
- https://www.1news.co.nz/2025/10/30/govts-puberty-blockers-decision-holding-up-life-or-death-health-guidelines/
- https://www.health.govt.nz/system/files/2024-11/Position_Statement_on_the_Use_of_Puberty_Blockers.pdf
- https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/514817/criticism-of-puberty-blockers-misguided-trans-girl-s-mother-says
- /content/files/anzsw/article/download/407/489.pdf
- https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14693062.2020.1868393?needAccess=true
- /content/files/journals/index-php/cjlg/article/download/3055/3257.pdf
- /content/files/journals/index-php/cjlg/article/download/1889/2032.pdf
- /content/files/nzjer/article/download/14/8.pdf
- https://www.nzfirst.nz/winston-peters-democracy-speech
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simeon_Brown
- https://iso.org.nz/2025/02/24/the-fight-against-gender-repression/
- https://www.nzfirst.nz/winston-peters-cogovernance-and-separatism-speech
- https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/572258/nz-first-agm-winston-peters-predicts-massive-political-victory-next-year
- https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/what-wellington-city-council-crown-observer-lindsay-mckenzie-said-in-his-first-report/55R2WTQSVFAFROWKIM7G57G42I/
- https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/the-quiet-shift-to-more-inclusive-pregnancy-language-and-the-long-road-toward-systemic-change/VH3OIWB7NQ5LLA24N5XIQVTKRY/
- https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/512142/deputy-pm-winston-peters-attacks-media-over-speech-reporting
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10273389/
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8118228/
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9813061/
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8726598/
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9398473/
- https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/pdf/10.1089/trgh.2016.0036
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11747946/
- /content/files/uploads/original_article/201512/20240402-26456-1ukp5pn.pdf
- https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/399433/trans-and-non-binary-health-and-wellbeing-report-reveals-severe-inequities
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_First_New_Zealand
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACT_New_Zealand
- https://thespinoff.co.nz/politics/04-12-2024/gender-affirming-care-affects-a-small-minority-so-why-the-public-consultation
- https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/new-zealand-first-proposes-legislation-to-define-woman-man-in-law/ZPSMNRVICZB53PQ5VAHKYHVJ3I/
- https://www.1news.co.nz/2023/11/29/prime-minister-luxon-reveals-his-49-actions-for-first-100-days/
- https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/543118/one-in-five-trans-and-non-binary-people-threatened-with-physical-violence
- /content/files/109645/1/dit_com_2018_05_04_partisanship_and_the_gender_gap_support_for_gender.pdf
- https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0038026120934684
- https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2246536?needAccess=true&role=button
- /content/files/politicsandgovernance/article/download/8107/3788.pdf
- /content/files/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/9F7B863D044AF7F8196A067F0C5AFF4D/S0017257X21000579a/div-class-title-gender-ideologies-and-polish-political-parties-div.pdf
- https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/21599165.2021.1873775?needAccess=true
- https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/13634607241257397
- /content/files/politicsandgovernance/article/download/8179/3796.pdf
- https://www.act.org.nz/people/karen-chhour
- /content/files/sites/default/files/documents/integrity-project_cass-response.pdf
- https://www.beehive.govt.nz/minister/biography/karen-chhour
- https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/release-of-review-into-absconding-bootcamp-youths-more-than-a-month-late/ZOMRWYQEQ5E2TETYHWL66TMXAI/
- https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/377560/st-kentigern-scholarships-a-good-thing-rugby-ranker
- https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/579385/govt-halts-new-puberty-blockers-prescriptions-for-gender-affirming-care
- /content/files/podcasts/the-house.xml
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10018052/
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11877077/
- https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/10398562241239478
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7752815/
- https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/bioethics/article/view/13149
- https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2793769
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9043984/
- https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/26895269.2024.2328249
- https://www.gendergp.com/puberty-blockers-bone-health-for-transgender-youth/
- https://www.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/145d64x/puberty_blockers_will_not_be_routinely_offered_to/
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12573551/
- https://www.nzherald.co.nz/the-listener/politics/danyl-mclauchlan-nz-firsts-bid-to-regulate-toilet-use-should-be-flushed-away/Z5C6JRQDYRECDJQX3DNZRA4L2E/
- https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/nz-government-wont-say-if-it-will-follow-uks-move-to-ban-routine-use-of-puberty-blockers-as-treatment-for-trans-youth/XM4LR3XIVZF2JAKJU74OOELSOU/
https://www.rnz.co.nz
