“Breaking Down the Machinery of Colonial Manipulation: How Peter Jackson's Moa Project Exposes the Neoliberal Playbook” - 12 July 2025

Kia ora whānau, E rere kākahu ki papaki-ai.

Another wealthy white man plays savior while extracting Indigenous heritage for profit. This time it's Peter Jackson's latest venture with Colossal Biosciences – a scheme masquerading as conservation while perpetuating the very colonial violence that caused the extinction in the first place. The de-extinction of the moa isn't about restoration; it's about technological colonialism dressed up as partnership.

Through examining Jackson's collaboration with Colossal Biosciences, this essay reveals how neoliberal capitalism weaponizes Indigenous knowledge and identity to generate profit while maintaining colonial power structures. The moa project exemplifies how white supremacist ideologies manifest through seemingly benevolent scientific endeavors, using Māori cultural symbols while denying genuine tino rangatiratanga.

White Saviorism Meets Genetic Colonialism

The moa project reveals how modern colonialism operates through technological partnerships that appear collaborative while maintaining extractive relationships. Jackson's involvement with Colossal Biosciences demonstrates the continuity between his earlier work promoting white supremacist narratives through the Lord of the Rings trilogy and his current ventures that appropriate Indigenous heritage for commercial gain.

Jackson's Lord of the Rings films established him as a filmmaker who consistently reinforces white supremacist mythology. The trilogy's casting of Māori actors exclusively as violent, brutish Uruk-hai while maintaining an entirely white cast for heroic roles demonstrates the deeply racist framework underlying Jackson's creative vision1. This pattern of using Indigenous bodies while denying them meaningful representation continues through the moa project.

The far-right's appropriation of Tolkien's work demonstrates how these narratives serve white supremacist ideology2. Peter Thiel's naming of his surveillance company Palantir after Tolkien's all-seeing stones reveals the connection between these fantasy narratives and contemporary tech-enabled authoritarianism3. Jackson's continued investment in companies like Colossal Biosciences demonstrates his alignment with this broader neoliberal-supremacist agenda.

The Machinery of Extractive Science

Colossal Biosciences operates as a venture capital firm disguised as a conservation organization, using Indigenous knowledge and biological resources to generate profit while maintaining colonial power structures. The company's misleading claims about "de-extincting" the dire wolf – which scientists have dismissed as genetically modified grey wolves rather than true resurrection – demonstrates their commitment to marketing over genuine scientific achievement4.

The company's approach to de-extinction fundamentally misrepresents the scientific process, creating "genetically modified" animals that resemble extinct species rather than true resurrection5. This technological sleight of hand serves to attract investment while delivering products that bear little resemblance to the promised outcomes.

Indigenous paleogeneticist Nic Rawlence warns that de-extinction projects risk creating "biopiracy" where Indigenous knowledge and biological heritage become commodified by multinational corporations6. The moa project exemplifies this extractive approach, using Māori cultural symbols and scientific knowledge to generate profit for overseas corporations while maintaining colonial control over Indigenous heritage.

Tokenistic Consultation and Manufactured Consent

The involvement of the Ngāi Tahu Research Centre in the moa project demonstrates how neoliberal colonialism operates through tokenistic consultation that creates an appearance of Indigenous leadership while maintaining extractive relationships. Multiple Māori researchers have expressed concerns about the lack of genuine consultation across iwi and the cherry-picking of support from individual rūnanga7.

Research shows there is virtually no Māori support for de-extinction projects, with concerns about intellectual property rights, DNA samples going offshore, and the project representing another form of colonialism8. The moa project proceeds despite these concerns, demonstrating how corporate interests override Indigenous self-determination.

The project's emphasis on creating "ecological reserves" for resurrected moa reveals its true purpose as eco-tourism rather than genuine conservation9. This commodification of Indigenous heritage transforms sacred taonga into tourist attractions while generating profit for non-Indigenous corporations.

Manufacturing Ecological Justification

The moa project uses environmental rhetoric to justify extractive practices while ignoring the structural causes of ecological destruction. Conservation experts argue that the millions spent on de-extinction could be better used to protect existing endangered species, with calculations showing that "roughly two species would go extinct for every one that could be revived"5.

The project's claim to address "the sins of the past" through de-extinction obscures the ongoing colonial violence that continues to drive biodiversity loss10. By focusing on technological solutions rather than addressing the neoliberal economic system that drives environmental destruction, the project perpetuates the very forces it claims to combat.

The reality is that most of the habitat required for moa survival has been destroyed, and the project offers no meaningful plan for habitat restoration9. This reveals the project's true nature as a technological spectacle rather than genuine conservation effort.

The Neoliberal Displacement of Indigenous Sovereignty

The moa project exemplifies how neoliberal capitalism co-opts Indigenous knowledge and cultural symbols while maintaining colonial control over resources and decision-making. The project's structure ensures that overseas corporations control the technology and intellectual property while Indigenous communities provide cultural legitimacy and biological resources11.

Jackson's collection of over 400 moa bones, which he describes as being "in our DNA" despite being a British immigrant, demonstrates the colonial appropriation of Indigenous heritage12. This claim to Indigenous knowledge and biological resources while maintaining extractive relationships exemplifies how settler colonialism operates through appropriation rather than genuine partnership.

The project's emphasis on Jackson as a "world builder" reveals how colonial mythology presents white men as creators and innovators while Indigenous peoples are relegated to supporting roles in their own cultural heritage. This narrative structure mirrors the colonial displacement that caused the moa's extinction in the first place.

Broader Implications for Indigenous Rights and Environmental Justice

The moa project represents a broader pattern of how neoliberal capitalism weaponizes environmental concerns to justify extractive practices while maintaining colonial power structures. The project's alignment with Peter Thiel's network of Tolkien-inspired companies demonstrates how white supremacist ideology manifests through technological ventures that appear progressive while serving authoritarian interests13.

The use of Indigenous knowledge and biological resources to generate profit for overseas corporations while maintaining colonial control over Indigenous communities demonstrates how modern colonialism operates through technological partnerships14. This pattern of "localwashing" creates an appearance of Indigenous leadership while maintaining extractive relationships.

The project's potential to influence government policy on conservation funding creates additional risks for Indigenous communities. The concern that de-extinction projects could be used to justify reduced funding for endangered species protection demonstrates how these technological spectacles serve neoliberal interests10.

Rejecting Technological Colonialism

The moa de-extinction project reveals how white supremacist ideology operates through seemingly benevolent technological ventures that appropriate Indigenous knowledge while maintaining colonial power structures. Peter Jackson's involvement demonstrates the continuity between his earlier work promoting racist narratives and his current ventures that extract Indigenous heritage for commercial gain.

Genuine environmental restoration requires addressing the structural causes of ecological destruction rather than pursuing technological spectacles that serve corporate interests. The hundreds of millions spent on de-extinction could be used to protect existing endangered species and restore habitats that benefit entire ecosystems.

True decolonization requires rejecting projects that maintain extractive relationships with Indigenous communities while appropriating their knowledge and cultural heritage. The moa project exemplifies how neoliberal capitalism co-opts environmental concerns to justify continued colonial violence while presenting itself as progressive partnership.

The fight against projects like the moa de-extinction scheme is part of the broader struggle for Indigenous sovereignty and environmental justice. By exposing how these technological ventures serve white supremacist interests, we can build movements that center Indigenous knowledge and self-determination in genuine environmental restoration.

Koha Statement

I am humble when asking readers who find value in my content to consider a donation/koha to support the cause: HTDM: 03-1546-0415173-000. The MGL understands these tough economic times for whānau so please only contribute a koha if you have capacity and wish to do so.

Kia kaha, kia māia, kia mau
Be strong, be brave, be steadfast

References