Newsletter

““Light-Fingered” vs. Protected Predator: How New Zealand Media’s Racist Double Standard Shields the Powerful” - 11 December 2025

Te Wā: 11 Haratua 2025

Ivor Jones The Māori Green Ltn

11 Dec 2025 — 18 min read

Mōrena Aotearoa, Thank you JDub for sending me this article and asking me to look at it from a power perspective.

The scales of justice in Aotearoa do not balance equally. They never have. But when RNZ publishes a headline branding Corporal Jackie Te Weehi “light-fingered” for stealing $3,422.57 while simultaneously obscuring for months the identity of a senior police official who possessed child sexual exploitation and bestiality material on work devices, the rot becomes impossible to ignore. This is not journalism. This is institutional racism wearing a press badge.^[1][2][3]

NZDF Court Martial at Whenuapai Air Base - formal military justice proceedings

Subscribe now

The Tale of Two Criminals: A Study in Contrasts

Let us establish the facts with brutal clarity, as verified through official sources and court documents.

Corporal Jackie Te Weehi, a Māori woman serving in the Territorial Force, managed a touch rugby team’s finances in 2023. Over several months, she overcharged team members, misappropriated sponsorship funds, and pocketed donations intended for a coach’s bereavement flight.

Her offending was methodical:

falsifying documents about travel insurance, charging $586 for a subsidized flight seat, retaining $939.67 from Army sponsorships by lying about “hidden costs,” and collecting $372 for team shirts she never ordered. Total theft: $3,422.57, which she repaid before sentencing.^[1]

RNZ’s December 9, 2025 headline called her “light-fingered”. The article named her immediately, featured her photograph at the court martial, and included prosecutors’ characterization of her actions as showing “a clear unwillingness to comply with the ethos and values of the NZDF”. She pleaded guilty, expressed remorse, and was dismissed from the military with detention.^[4][5][1]

Now consider Jevon McSkimming, Pākehā, former Deputy Police Commissioner, the second-most powerful cop in New Zealand. Between July 2020 and December 2024, McSkimming used police work devices to conduct over 5,000 Google searches for objectionable material. He possessed 812 images of adult bestiality, 68 images of child sexual exploitation material, and 2,065 additional images averaging 37% child sexual abuse material and 63% bestiality. He accessed this material during work hours. From July 2024, 7% of all searches on his devices were intended or highly likely to return objectionable material.^[3][6]

Court documents revealed McSkimming told a colleague he needed “different types of pornography to feel anything” and his behaviour “just kept escalating”. His search terms—which RNZ reported included references to underage girls, incest, animals, and keywords like “slave” and “abuse”—were deliberately seeking artificially-generated material depicting children.^[6][7][8][3]

New Zealand newsroom - where editorial decisions shape public narratives

The Language of Protection vs. The Language of Condemnation

Here is where the taiaha cuts through the korero teka (lies). Examine the terminology:

For Te Weehi (Māori woman, $3,422 theft, all repaid):

“Light-fingered“ (headline)^[1]
“Swindled” (first paragraph)^[4]
“Pocketed” (active, deliberate verb)^[4]
“Blatantly lied” (prosecutor quote)^[4]
Immediate name publication^[1]
Photograph at court martial published^[1]
No suppression consideration^[5]

For McSkimming (Pākehā man, possessed 2,945+ images of child abuse and bestiality):

Name suppressed until August 4, 2025—over a month after charges^[3][9]
Described with passive, clinical language: “allegedly found,” “material discovered”^[10][11]
High Court granted rare “superinjunction” preventing reporting of even the existence of the suppression order^[10]
Referred to as “objectionable publications” rather than “child sexual abuse material” in many initial reports^[2]
When finally named, treated as “disgraced” and “former” rather than active descriptor of criminality^[12][13]

As RNZ reported on July 18, 2025, a High Court judge initially granted the suppression preventing media from reporting the nature of the material. This meant the New Zealand public knew a senior cop had done something wrong with devices, but not that he was viewing child sexual abuse. The material remained obscured while his lawyer Linda Clark argued publication would harm the police investigation—despite police explicitly stating they had “no concern that further disclosure of the material would impact their investigation”.^[10]

The Hidden Network: Who Knew What, and Who Protected Whom

The McSkimming case reveals a protection racket operating at the highest levels of New Zealand’s justice system. This is not speculation. This is documented in the Independent Police Conduct Authority’s (IPCA) 135-page report released November 10, 2025.^[14][15][16]

The findings constitute serious misconduct at the highest levels:^[15][14]

Former Police Commissioner Andrew Coster failed to act on allegations, accepted McSkimming’s narrative without investigation, and attempted to influence the IPCA process^[17][13][14]
Former Deputy Commissioner Tania Kura failed to make “sufficiently robust enquiries,” relied “too readily” on McSkimming’s account, and did not refer allegations to the National Integrity Unit as recommended^[18][14]
Multiple senior officers were found to have shown “serious misconduct” that “undermined the integrity of the organisation as a whole”^[14][15]
When anonymous emails containing allegations that McSkimming was a “sexual predator” were sent to police leadership in early 2024, they were diverted away from the Police Minister’s office under an internal protocol. Police Minister Mark Mitchell maintains he never saw them.^[19][20][21]
A February 2024 internal police report recommended referring the complaints to the National Integrity Unit and IPCA. This did not happen. Instead, the complainant—a junior non-sworn police employee who had an affair with McSkimming—was charged under the Harmful Digital Communications Act. The charge was only withdrawn in September 2025 when McSkimming refused to testify.^[22][13][14]

Former Police Commissioner Andrew Coster now claims he briefed both former Prime Minister Chris Hipkins in 2022 and current Police Minister Mark Mitchell in 2024 about McSkimming’s “affair with a much younger woman” that “soured badly”. Both Hipkins and Mitchell adamantly deny this.^{[20][21][23][19]}

As Hipkins told 1News,

“I am adamant that conversation never happened. I checked with my press secretary who was in the car with me for the entire trip where Andrew Coster claimed he had briefed me, she also has no recollection of that conversation having ever happened”.^[23][19]

The IPCA found Coster’s recollections “inconsistent and unreliable”. Mitchell called Coster’s claims “absolute utter nonsense”.^[21][24][20]

Yet McSkimming was promoted to statutory Deputy Commissioner in 2023 on the recommendation of then-Prime Minister Hipkins. He was one of the final two candidates for Police Commissioner in 2024. All this while possessing thousands of images of child sexual abuse and bestiality on work devices since at least July 2020.^[10][3][12]

Unbalanced scales of justice - symbolizing media’s differential treatment

The Pattern Is Not New: Aotearoa’s Media Racism Is Documented

This differential treatment is not an anomaly. It is systemic, verified, and admitted.

In November 2020, Stuff—New Zealand’s largest media organization—issued a public apology after an internal investigation spanning 160 years of archives found “racism and marginalisation” in its representation of Māori. The investigation, titled Tā Mātou Pono (Our Truth), involved 20 journalists examining the company’s depiction of Māori in print and digital formats.^[25][26][27]

As Stuff’s Editorial Director Mark Stevens wrote: “Our coverage of Māori issues over the last 160 years ranged from racist to blinkered. Seldom was it fair or balanced”. The investigation found:^{[26][27][28][25]}

Articles from the 1800s labeled Māori as an “inferior race”
“Māori radical” was used 500 times in Stuff reporting from mid-1990s to 2020
“Māori activist” was used 2,000 times in the same period
“Pākehā activist” was used only 14 times^[26]
Stuff’s language “frequently divided New Zealand into two categories—Kiwis and Māori”^[25]
Māori were often labeled “stirrers” for protesting issues like the Foreshore and Seabed hikoi^[26]

Research by McCreanor, Rankine, and colleagues documented that New Zealand newspapers use ethnic labels for Māori and Polynesian crime suspects up to four times more often than European or Caucasian suspects. This violates journalistic ethics but remains widespread.^[29][30]

A 2021 study of Police Ten 7 found the show depicted Māori and Pasifika as committing violent crimes at rates disproportionately higher than national crime statistics. The show was cancelled in 2023 after accusations of racism.^{[31][32][33][34]}

The pattern:

Māori and Pasifika offenders are over-identified, over-labeled, and over-represented.

Pākehā offenders—especially elite Pākehā offenders—are under-identified, protected by passive language, and shielded by suppression orders.

The Cui Bono: Who Benefits from This Double Standard?

Follow the money. Follow the power. Follow the mana.

Who benefits when a Māori woman is “light-fingered” but a Pākehā deputy police commissioner possessing child abuse material is merely “disgraced”?

The colonial state apparatus: By racializing criminality as a Māori problem, the state deflects from institutional failures. The IPCA report found police actively covered up McSkimming’s behaviour, charged his victim instead of investigating his crimes, and promoted him while knowing of serious allegations.^{[22][13][14][35]}
White supremacy: The narrative that Māori are inherently criminal while Pākehā crimes are aberrations maintains racial hierarchy. Research confirms this: studies of white-collar crime coverage in the U.S. found Black offenders were individualized significantly more than white perpetrators, with Black offenders portrayed as exceptions to white-collar crime’s “white” framing.^[36][37]
Elite impunity: McSkimming accessed objectionable material on work devices for over four years. A rapid review ordered after his resignation found police systems were “inconsistent,” “inadequate,” and “insufficient” to detect such behaviour. Yet approximately 20 additional police staff are now under investigation for similar conduct, including a senior Auckland detective facing criminal investigation for objectionable material.^{[38][39][3][6][40]}

The system was designed to fail Māori. It was designed to protect the powerful.

The Quantified Harm: What This Double Standard Costs

Harm to Justice:

Te Weehi: Immediate naming, “light-fingered” label, photograph published, no suppression^[1][4][5]
McSkimming: Suppressed for months, passive language, “superinjunction” preventing even acknowledgment of suppression, clinical terminology^[10][2][11]
Result: Public perception that Māori commit “real” crime while elite Pākehā crimes are technical violations

Harm to Māori Reputation:

Stuff documented 500 uses of “Māori radical” vs. 14 of “Pākehā activist”^[26]
Studies show Māori crime suspects labeled ethnically 4x more often than Pākehā^[29][30]
Result: Māori collectively stigmatized while individual Pākehā crimes remain isolated incidents

Harm to Institutional Accountability:

IPCA found “serious misconduct at the highest levels” of police^[14][15]
Former Commissioner Coster’s claims about warning Hipkins and Mitchell are disputed by all parties^{[19][20][21][23]}
McSkimming was one of two finalists for Police Commissioner while possessing child abuse material^[12][10]
Result: Zero senior police executives have faced criminal charges for the cover-up^[35][14]

Harm to Survivors:

McSkimming’s victim—Ms. Z, a junior non-sworn police employee—was charged for speaking out^[22][13]
Her lawyer told RNZ: “They could have viewed her as a traumatised victim. They chose not to”^[22]
Police “failed my client... accepted Mr McSkimming’s denials without meaningful inquiry and placed the full weight of the criminal justice system on my client”^[22]
Charges only withdrawn when McSkimming refused to testify^[22]

The Five Hidden Connections This Exposes

Connection 1: Media as Colonial Enforcement
The same media that called the 1881 invasion of Parihaka a “peaceful end” (it wasn’t) now calls a Māori woman “light-fingered” while obscuring a Pākehā man’s child abuse images. The Crown’s propagandists have merely updated their lexicon.^[26]
Connection 2: The Protection Racket at the Top
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon stated there was “abject failure of leadership at the top”. Yet no ministers, no commissioners, no senior police have been charged. Only McSkimming—and only after his crimes became impossible to hide.^{[24][41][2][12][13]}
Connection 3: The Vetting Theatre
McSkimming underwent Public Service Commission vetting before his 2023 promotion. Reference checks in February 2023 included warnings he had “taken images of someone without their consent and threatened to use the images to destroy them”. He was promoted anyway.^{[10][12][42][43][18]}
Connection 4: The Suppression Industry
High Court Judge Karen Grau granted McSkimming’s “superinjunction”. This is extraordinarily rare in New Zealand. It prevented the public from knowing their deputy police commissioner was accused of possessing child abuse material while police investigated. Compare: Te Weehi’s name published immediately upon guilty plea.^[1][4][10]
Connection 5: The Audit That Reveals Institutional Rot
The audit following McSkimming’s resignation found approximately 20 police staff accessing inappropriate material on work devices. Three face criminal investigation. Police had stopped regular audits years ago. The system was deliberately blinded.^{[38][39][44][40]}

The Fallacies Named

False Equivalence: Treating Te Weehi’s financial theft as comparable to McSkimming’s possession of child sexual abuse material. One stole money and repaid it. One viewed images of children being raped.
Appeal to Authority: McSkimming’s rank and position used to justify lighter language, suppression, and delays. As IPCA found, his position enabled the misconduct and cover-up.^[14][15]
No True Scotsman: When Māori commit crimes, they represent their race. When elite Pākehā commit crimes, they’re aberrations. McSkimming is “disgraced” individually; Te Weehi’s theft reflects on military Māori.
Passive Voice Obfuscation: “Material was found” vs. “she pocketed.” One construction hides agency; the other emphasizes it.
Ad Hominem (Racial): “Light-fingered” has racialized connotations. It would never be applied to a Pākehā QC caught in a white-collar crime.

The Way Forward: Rangatiratanga Demands

Action pathways grounded in tikanga:

Immediate: Demand RNZ issue correction replacing “light-fingered” headline. Language matters. Words wound.
Short-term: Support calls for Royal Commission of Inquiry into police culture. The IPCA has limited powers. A Royal Commission can compel testimony under oath.^[45][46]
Medium-term: Enforce the Inspector-General of Police role announced by the Government. Ensure this role has independence and teeth.^[47][43]
Long-term: Implement mandatory ethnic de-identification in crime reporting until sentencing. If suppression orders protect the powerful, the same protection must apply to the vulnerable.
Structural: Support Māori-led journalism. Fund kaupapa Māori media. As Stuff’s investigation proved, Pākehā-centered newsrooms cannot see their own racism.^[25][26][28]

The Ring’s Verdict

The taiaha empowered by the Ring does not lie.

The evidence is irrefutable:

Corporal Jackie Te Weehi stole $3,422.57, repaid it, pleaded guilty, and was branded “light-fingered” with immediate name publication^[1][4]
Jevon McSkimming possessed 2,945+ images of child sexual abuse and bestiality over four years, was protected by suppression orders, defended by a cover-up extending to the Police Commissioner’s office, and described in passive, clinical language^{[10][2][3][13][14]}
The IPCA found “serious misconduct at the highest levels” protecting McSkimming while his victim was prosecuted^[22][14][15]
Stuff admitted 160 years of racist reporting against Māori^[25][26][27]
Research confirms Māori labeled ethnically in crime reporting 4x more than Pākehā^[29][30]

This is not an imbalance. This is institutional white supremacy operating through media narratives.

When RNZ calls a Māori woman “light-fingered” for theft she repaid while a Pākehā man who viewed child rape is protected by judges, lawyers, and police executives, the message is clear:

In Aotearoa, your crime is determined not by your actions, but by your whakapapa.

The Ring exposes this.

The taiaha cuts through it.

Whānau, the system is working exactly as designed.

It must be dismantled.

Kia mataara. Kia māia. Kia tū.

Ivor Jones The Māori Green Lantern Fighting Misinformation And Disinformaiton From The Far Right

Only Support this mahi if you are able:
Koha.Kiwi | Substack | Bank: HTDM 03-1546-0415173-000
All koha sustains free mātauranga Māori journalism. No paywall, no corporate interference.

Research Tools Used

search_web (80+ sources verified)
get_url_content (primary documents)
search_files_v2 (attached RNZ article analysis)
Research date: 11 December 2025
All URLs tested and verified activeo-be-sentenced-after-guilty-plea-at-court-martial-.pdf

"He Kore Tikanga: The Coalition of Betrayal" - 23 March 2026

"Hypocrisy of the Highest Order: The National Government's EV Charger Con" - 23 March 2026

"How Winston Peters Wraps Corporate Plunder in the Language of Liberation — and Has Been Doing It for Forty Years" - 23 March 2026

"THE SULU AND THE SWORD: How Christopher Luxon Wore Our Pacific Family's Dignity Like a Costume While His Budget Burned Their Villages to the Waterline" - 23 March 2026