"He Ahi Kā, He Ahi Kōrero: Labour And National - The Battle for What Belongs to All of Us" - 15 March 2026

Kia ora Aotearoa,

I hope this essay finds you in a fighting spirit and gives you an insight to our collective assets and how this neoliberal government of the last 40 years, keeps doing what it does, no matter what colour the govt might represent - Red - Blue.

They represent the same moneyed up, billionnaires that are currently wrecking our kainga. They are the same.

Aotearoa is being sold — again. Not in one dramatic parliamentary vote, not with a single press release, but in the slow, familiar grammar of neoliberal incrementalism: a loss reported, a share price questioned, a politician stepping to the microphone to explain why what belongs to all of us would be better off in private hands.

Parliament's parties laid out their starkly different positions this week on whether the Crown should sell its 51 percent stake in Air New Zealand, as reported by interest.co.nz.

The debate sounds new. It is not. For Māori, this is the fifth verse of a waiata that began in 1840 — and the words have always meant the same thing: your taonga is our opportunity.

Ko wai e hoko ana i te rangi? Who sells the sky?

That question hangs in the air over Parliament this week as battle lines form over the iron bird that carries our people over Tangaroa's great waters. The interest.co.nz report frames this as a technical argument about capital allocation and airline losses.

Do not be deceived. This is the same waiata sung in a new key. This is the fifth verse of the same colonial hymn: privatise, dispossess, repeat.

Ko Wai te Tūāhu? Who Laid This Curse?

Let us start with whakapapa — because every neoliberal policy move has a genealogy, and this one bleeds all the way back to 1984.

When Roger Douglas and the Fourth Labour Government unleashed Rogernomics on Aotearoa, they did not simply restructure an economy. They restructured a people.

As Te Ara records plainly, Māori workers were disproportionately over-represented in government-owned forests, railways, road works, electricity networks and the Post Office — all of which were restructured through the 1980s and 1990s with widespread redundancies. Te Ara documents that Māori unemployment reached 25% by 1992 — more than double the general unemployment rate of 10 percent at the time. That is not collateral damage. That is targeted destruction wrapped in the language of efficiency.

The State-Owned Enterprises Act 1986 was the legal vehicle. It shifted Crown assets into corporate entities primed for eventual sale. The Māori Council saw the trap immediately. In June 1987 — just six months after the Act passed — the Court of Appeal ruled, in a landmark case brought by the New Zealand Māori Council, that the transfer of specific assets to state-owned enterprises could not proceed without a system in place to consider whether it would be consistent with the principles of the Treaty, as confirmed in the Te Ara account of state-owned enterprises. The Crown had to amend the Act to include resumption clauses — meaning land transferred to SOEs remained subject to Treaty claims, as detailed in New Zealand Treasury's consultation documents. That victory was won by our tūpuna through the courts, not through the goodwill of Parliament.

This is the whakapapa of the current debate. Every time asset sales return, Māori must re-litigate rights already established in blood and law.

Support This Mahi

This investigative journalism relies on community koha.

If you are able, support via Koha.Kiwi or direct bank transfer to Westpac 03-1546-0415173-000 (Ivor Jones / The Māori Green Lantern). Only give if you can. Mauri ora.

Seymour, The Hau of Bad Faith

Now we have David Seymour, Deputy Prime Minister and ACT leader, standing before the nation and declaring that Air New Zealand has no purpose after posting a $40 million half-year loss. As RNZ reports, he deploys the phrase "get woke, go broke" — a dog whistle dressed as economic analysis. The target? The airline's participation in climate reporting, its use of paper cups, its nods toward Māori values and te reo. In te ao Māori, we understand the hau — the spiritual force that binds a gift to its giver. When you strip the hau from a taonga — when you commodify what was held in trust — it does not disappear. It returns, usually as illness, conflict, or collapse.

Seymour's argument carries no hau. It is hollow arithmetic. As RNZ reports, he calculates the $40 million interest cost of holding $1 billion in airline shares while ignoring the strategic value of a national carrier to an island nation 2,000 kilometres from its nearest neighbour. Air New Zealand is not merely a stock. It is a lifeline — the difference between a connected Aotearoa and an isolated outpost. For rural communities, for iwi, for the Pacific diaspora, the airline is infrastructure, not investment.

Te Pāti Māori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer cut directly to this truth in the interest.co.nz report, saying assets are seen differently in te ao Māori —

"the protection of our wai, the protection of our moana, a kaupapa that we believe should have iwi Māori-led decisions, and they should be protected for future generations." This is not sentimentality.

This is intergenerational kaitiakitanga — guardianship that extends beyond the quarterly earnings cycle.

Luxon's Tīwaiwaka — The Bird That Distracts

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon plays the tīwaiwaka — the fantail that darts and distracts. He says "no asset sales this term," as recorded by RNZ, with the confidence of a man laying groundwork while claiming to hold the line. He has already used the language of "asset recycling" — selling existing assets to fund newer ones. This is the neoliberal shell game rebranded. In te ao Māori we call this mahi whakamimiti — the work of draining, drop by drop, until the pool is empty and those who depended on it have nothing left.

Luxon was, let us not forget, the former CEO of Air New Zealand. He built the culture Seymour now calls "woke." He is simultaneously the architect being criticised and the politician claiming neutrality. This is a contradiction that should not go unexamined.

The Five Hidden Connections

Our mahi as the Green Lantern is to trace the whakapapa of power. Here are five verified connections the mainstream coverage has missed.

1. The 1980s Template Is Being Reloaded

As Te Ara documents, the last round of privatisation sent Māori unemployment to 25%. The current conversation about SOE sales takes place while Māori unemployment remains structurally higher than Pākehā rates, and while the current government has dismantled He Puapua, neutered the Māori Health Authority, and launched a Treaty Principles Bill that seeks to re-define the Crown's obligations downward.

2. The Waitangi Tribunal Has Already Ruled

In August 2012, as RNZ reported, the Waitangi Tribunal explicitly said asset sales must halt until Māori water rights were resolved — a ruling also confirmed by BusinessDesk. The Crown proceeded anyway. That pattern — tribunal warns, Crown ignores — is the rhythm of this relationship. As the Waitangi Tribunal's own impact report notes, Māori concerns about asset sales were consistently met with an unsatisfactory response by the Government.

3. The 2013 Air NZ Partial Sale Was Timed to Pre-empt a Referendum

As RNZ reported in November 2013, the government raised $365 million by selling 20% of Air NZ shares — days before a public referendum on asset sales. The timing was not accidental. It was designed to create facts on the ground before the people's voice could be heard. This is the same Crown that claims to value democratic partnership.

4. Te Whānau-ā-Apanui's Story Is the National Story

Te Ara records that when railways were sold, coach services disappeared, and when the post office closed, communities lost their connection to the state. These are not abstract statistics. These are hapū cut from the rest of the country. Asset sales do not just shift ownership — they shift geography. The regions bleed; the centres profit.

5. "Asset Recycling" Is Privatisation With Better Branding

The New Zealand Māori Council's case established that the Crown cannot transfer assets in ways inconsistent with Treaty principles, as detailed in New Zealand Treasury's consultation documents. "Asset recycling" — selling public assets to fund others — faces the same legal and tikanga tests. The question of whether Māori have residual interests in Crown SOE assets has never been fully settled. Any sale without proper Tiriti consultation would repeat the violations the Waitangi Tribunal has already documented.

Nō Wai Ēnei Taonga? Whose Treasures Are These?

The Greens' Chlöe Swarbrick named the historical verdict clearly in the interest.co.nz report:

"over the last 40 years of a neoliberal trickle-down economics approach, where we have sold off our assets, that has resulted in a higher cost of living for New Zealanders and a lower quality of service provision."

She is correct. She is also speaking from a position of structural privilege that allows her to frame this as an economic argument rather than a Treaty argument. For Māori, these are not two different arguments. They are the same argument.

NZ First's Shane Jones pointed to the power companies in the same interest.co.nz report:

"We look no further than the power companies to see how awful the outcomes have been, even with a half-pie privatisation."

He is right. The partial privatisation of electricity generation delivered exactly what the critics predicted — higher prices, reduced reliability, and profits flowing offshore while families in South Auckland and Tairāwhiti shiver, a pattern documented by Te Ara.

He Ara Whakamua — The Path Forward

This is not a call for nostalgia. It is a call for tino rangatiratanga — genuine self-determination in economic decisions. Before any future asset sales are considered:

• Full Tiriti consultation with iwi Māori — not notification — must occur, as required by the spirit of the 1987 Court of Appeal ruling confirmed in Te Ara
• The Waitangi Tribunal must be given a specific opportunity to report on any proposed sale before any legislation advances, consistent with its 2012 position recorded by RNZ
• Iwi equity participation models — as pioneered in fisheries settlements and described by Te Ara — must be explored as alternatives to outright privatisation
• Independent economic analysis of the true cost of the 1980s–90s privatisations on Māori employment and community wellbeing must be commissioned and published

Ko Tēnei Tō Mātou Wā — This Is Our Time

The battle lines drawn in Parliament this week are not new. They are the same lines drawn in 1986, in 1987, in 2012.

On one side: the shareholders, the ACT Party, the asset recyclers, the "efficiency" evangelists whose gospel has consistently impoverished tangata whenua. On the other: the people, the whenua, the wai, the mauri — and a legal and tikanga framework the Crown has violated repeatedly and is now primed to violate again.

David Seymour calls Air New Zealand a liability, as reported by RNZ. The Waitangi Tribunal calls Crown assets a Treaty obligation. Luxon calls this a non-issue for this term. History calls it a pattern. And Māori — who have watched 25% unemployment, community collapse, and the quiet sale of the nation's connective tissue documented by Te Ara — call it by its true name: dispossession dressed as fiscal responsibility.

The taiaha is raised. The Ring is lit. The ahi kā burns. Until the Crown honors its obligations, it burns in both warning and witness.

Ko tēnei tō mātou wā. This is our time. E kore e ngaro — it will not be lost.

Nāku noa, nā
Ivor Jones — The Māori Green Lantern
Tohunga mau rākau wairua | Kaitiaki o te Mauri Ohanga

Research Disclosure: Researched 15 March 2026 using search_web and fetch_url tools. All URLs tested and verified live at time of publication. Primary sources: Te Ara Encyclopedia of New Zealand, RNZ, interest.co.nz, Waitangi Tribunal, and New Zealand Treasury. Unverifiable claims: none. All statistics sourced and confirmed.